On December 31, the Executive Branch issued Decree of Necessity and Urgency (DNU) 941/2025, through which it reformed the functioning of the Argentine intelligence system. This reform was not enacted through a law debated in Congress, but rather unilaterally, during the legislative recess.

Why should this matter to you?

Because it changes the way in which the State can monitor you, directly affecting your freedom, autonomy, and privacy.

You have no way of knowing how your personal data are used

The DNU requires more than 15 public agencies to share citizens’ personal data with the State Intelligence Secretariat (SIDE), without establishing specific procedures or oversight mechanisms. The decree thus becomes a tool for mass surveillance. Moreover, the accumulation of large volumes of data within a single agency is even more dangerous given the State’s lack of an adequate information security policy and the frequency of data breaches.

The decree provides for no form of citizen oversight of SIDE’s activities and further concentrates power within this agency. SIDE may request information from provinces and municipalities, approve secret budgets, and share personal data with foreign agencies without judicial authorization—all under absolute secrecy. No one will know how your information is used or to whom it is disclosed.

No one oversees those who oversee

The decree establishes that intelligence activities are, by definition, covert. This means that you will not be able to know whether you are being investigated, why, or what information is being held about you. The covert nature of these activities can frustrate potential investigations aimed at establishing State responsibility. There is no way to seek redress if mistakes are made or abuses occur. Secrecy becomes the rule.

An intelligence agency with the power to detain you

For the first time in democracy, intelligence agents are granted the power to detain individuals. SIDE may carry out the “apprehension” of persons without clear criteria, without defined guarantees, and without judicial authorization. This opens the door to arbitrary detentions, persecution, and intimidation. It effectively transforms intelligence services into a kind of secret police operating without oversight.

The military would return to internal security tasks

For decades, Argentina worked to clearly separate national defense (the military) from internal security (the police). This separation was a lesson learned from the dictatorship: the armed forces should not exercise control over the civilian population. This decree allows the Armed Forces to carry out intelligence activities on “non-state organizations”—without clarifying which organizations fall under this category or what criteria would apply—and removes civilian oversight. This represents a dangerous historical regression.

The return of the “internal enemy” doctrine

This DNU significantly expands the concept of counterintelligence to include the prevention of infiltration, espionage, sabotage, influence, interference, or external intervention detrimental to the decision-making processes of public authorities, national strategic interests, and/or the population at large, including “multidimensional approaches” involving state and non-state actors.

By amending Article 4 of Law No. 25,520, the prohibitions designed to prevent intelligence agencies from engaging in political intelligence (such as influencing political, social, or economic life, political parties, or public opinion) are rendered irrelevant due to the inclusion of an extremely broad exception: counterintelligence activities are authorized to carry out practices that were previously prohibited. In practice, this relaxes legal limits on domestic intelligence and enables political espionage in the name of counterintelligence.

The vagueness of certain terms raises serious questions about how these provisions will be applied in practice. This concern is heightened by the dissemination, in December, of an alleged National Intelligence Plan (PIN), which explicitly identified anarchists, Indigenous peoples, environmental activists, and journalists who “misinform” or “delegitimize” the government as “internal enemies.”

As a result, the rights to freedom of expression, association, and petitioning the authorities are placed at serious risk. Demanding legislation (such as the Glaciers Law or funding for disability programs) could turn individuals into intelligence targets, making them subject to surveillance, infiltration, and even detention.

Why now? Why in this way?

This manifestly unconstitutional DNU breaks basic democratic consensus, expands the scope of State discretion, weakens oversight mechanisms, and enables practices that were believed to be part of the past. By authorizing tools for surveillance, persecution, and detention, it sends a direct signal to those who defend rights, territories, and democracy.

Once again, decisions of extreme importance are made without legislative debate. The constitutional requirements for issuing decrees of necessity and urgency are clearly not met: there are no exceptional circumstances preventing Congress from enacting legislation, and reforms of this magnitude, far from being adopted unilaterally, should be carried out only with broad political consensus. Congress must reject this decree.

Signatories:

Amnistía Internacional Argentina, Asociación Argentina de Abogados Ambientalistas / CAJE, Asociación Civil por la Igualdad y la Justicia (ACIJ), Poder Ciudadano, CELS, Democracia en Red, Fundación SES, Fundación Vía Libre, Campaña Argentina por el Derecho a la Educación (CADE), Fundación Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (FARN), Fundación para el Desarrollo de Políticas Sustentables (Fundeps), Fundación para el Desarrollo Humano Integral, Fundación Protestante Hora de Obrar, Xumek- Asociación para la Promoción y Protección de los Derechos Humanos, Fundación Cambio Democrático, Instituto de Estudios Comparados en Ciencias Penales y Sociales (INECIP), Instituto Latinoamericano de Seguridad y Democracia (ILSED), Comisión Argentina para Refugiados y Migrantes (CAREF), Abogados y Abogadas del Noroeste Argentino en Derechos Humanos y Estudios Sociales (ANDHES), Consciente Colectivo, Fundación Huésped, Greenpeace, Federación Ecuménica de Cuyo (FEC).

Contact:

Mayca Balaguer, maycabalaguer@fundeps.ord

Within the framework of the alliance with UNICEF Argentina, Fundeps visited the municipalities of Villaguay, Ezeiza, and Río Tercero, which are part of the Healthy Environments program under the Municipalities United for Children and Adolescents (MUNA) initiative. Each team is making steady progress in developing regulations to strengthen children’s well-being and nutrition, thereby consolidating a local agenda committed to protecting and promoting healthy environments.

Fundeps, in alliance with UNICEF Argentina, supported a key regulatory-strengthening process throughout 2025 to promote health-enhancing environments in various communities across the country.

During September and October, we visited the municipalities of Villaguay (Entre Ríos), Ezeiza (Buenos Aires), and Río Tercero (Córdoba) with the aim of deepening our work with the MUNA teams that sustain on-the-ground actions focused on promoting health and adequate nutrition, especially for children. At these meetings, we shared with local authorities the progress made and the challenges faced in designing local legal tools that seek to give solidity, continuity, and reach to public policies linked to health-promoting environments.

Municipalities leading the way

The experiences of Villaguay, Ezeiza, and Río Tercero show the commitment of local governments to moving forward with comprehensive policies that improve community well-being. Each municipality is implementing actions to promote physical activity, expand access to healthy foods in educational institutions and public spaces, and strengthen food and nutritional education processes.

In 2025, these localities took on the challenge of developing local legal instruments that would allow them to consolidate and expand these initiatives with a rights-based, child-centered approach. Fundeps and UNICEF provided technical guidance, offering evidence, regulatory references, and relevant examples.

These municipalities now have the opportunity to chart a path toward stronger protection of the right to health and adequate nutrition, ensuring that future generations grow up in healthier, safer, and more equitable environments.

The importance of promoting healthy environments

Fundeps, together with UNICEF, developed the technical document “Regulatory tools to promote healthy environments in municipalities,” aimed at guiding local regulatory processes to protect the rights to health, adequate nutrition, and a dignified childhood.

This document, based on recommendations from human rights organizations and the best available scientific evidence, recognizes that creating environments that support health is a public health priority due to its direct impact on quality of life and on the prevention of non-communicable chronic diseases (NCDs), the leading cause of death in Argentina.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), healthy environments are those that reduce risks, strengthen people’s care capacities, and promote autonomy in the spaces where they live, study, work, and play.

Dietary patterns in Argentina show high consumption of ultra-processed products and low intake of fruits and vegetables. According to UNICEF and FIC Argentina (2023), only 20% of children and adolescents meet the recommended consumption of fruits and vegetables, while ultra-processed products account for more than 35% of daily calories. Added to this is a high level of sedentary behavior: 64% of the population does not engage in sufficient physical activity, and more than 80% of adolescents do not meet WHO recommendations.

In this context, municipalities play a strategic role in driving policies that transform everyday environments and make it easier to adopt healthy lifestyles.

Why are local ordinances essential?

The report highlights that municipalities are the level of government closest to the population, capable of adapting national and provincial policies to local realities. Having an ordinance on healthy environments allows for:

• Strengthening actions already being carried out by health, education, and social development departments, based on the highest protection standards and a human-rights approach.
• Ensuring the sustainability and continuity of policies beyond changes in administration.
• Defining obligations and responsibilities for each actor involved, as well as sanctions and compliance mechanisms.
• Facilitating the allocation of resources and specific budgets for the issue.
• Promoting intersectoral coordination and citizen participation, ensuring that policies respond to real territorial needs.

Thus, municipal regulations function as tools to institutionalize and protect the progress made in health, nutrition, and child development, creating conditions that endure over time.

Toward sustainable, rights-based local policy

Building healthy environments requires a comprehensive, long-term approach. It involves not only transforming physical spaces but also institutional frameworks, everyday practices, and food culture.

At Fundeps, we continue to support municipalities in this effort, providing technical assistance, training, and reference materials that strengthen their institutional capacities and promote social participation.

Promoting healthy environments ultimately means building fairer, healthier communities where all people—especially children—can fully exercise their rights to health, adequate nutrition, and a dignified life.

Authors:
María Laura Fons
Victoria Sibila

Contact:
Maga Merlo: magamerlov@fundeps.org

Fundeps, in partnership with UNICEF Argentina, developed this technical document that brings together regulatory tools and practical recommendations to help local governments promote sustainable public policies that improve the habits and nutrition of children and adolescents. It is a resource designed to support municipalities in creating healthier environments with access to safe water, adequate food options, recreational spaces, physical activity, and breastfeeding support, among other key measures.

Within the framework of COP30 held in Belém do Pará (Brazil), members and allies of the Coalition for Human Rights in Development advanced a series of collective demands to Public Development Banks (PDBs) to support a community-led energy transition that respects rights and meets the needs of communities in the Global South.*

Within the framework of COP30 held in Belém do Pará (Brazil), members and allies of the Coalition for Human Rights in Development advanced a series of collective demands to Public Development Banks (PDBs) to support a community-led energy transition that respects rights and meets the needs of communities in the Global South.

Public development banks, through their climate commitments and financial support, are positioning themselves as key actors in the energy transition, especially in the Global South. Between January 2022 and June 2025, public development banks invested a total of 245.5 billion U.S. dollars in energy projects worldwide, mainly in the form of loans and through the private sector.

The largest share of investments went to the solar energy sector (30%), followed by transmission lines (24%) and wind energy (22%). However, research shows that PDBs continue to invest money in fossil fuels, often through financial intermediaries. In addition, PDBs have largely supported false solutions in the form of large-scale renewable energy projects, technological solutions, extractive activities, and market-based approaches.

In this context, in recent years, the Coalition for Human Rights in Development, of which Fundeps is a member, has involved its membership and allies in discussions on a just energy transition and the role of PDBs, with the aim of exposing false solutions and contradictions, while developing demands on what a truly just transition should look like—one centered on the voices and demands of affected communities.

Demands to Public Development Banks

As part of this process, a position paper was developed that contains a series of demands for PDBs to support a community-led energy transition that respects rights and meets the needs of communities in the Global South. The main demands identified were the following:

1. Recognize communities as central actors and protagonists of the energy transition
The rights of communities most affected by climate change—who are already struggling to secure water, food, housing, livelihoods, and cultural survival—must be at the heart of the transition. PDBs must shift their paradigm: moving from viewing communities as passive “beneficiaries,” obstacles, or victims of development, to recognizing them as stakeholders and protagonists of the energy transition. Incorporating this recognition into policies and practices means treating local communities and Indigenous Peoples not as victims to be compensated or hastily displaced, but as co-creators and co-monitors of just energy solutions that put people and the planet first.

2. Prioritize financing for decentralized, small-scale, community-led energy solutions
Across the Global South, local communities are advancing grassroots solutions to mitigate the effects of climate change and generate energy through small-scale projects. These projects, designed through participatory, inclusive, and feminist approaches, can effectively meet the needs of local communities and prevent harm.

3. Accountability in design, monitoring, and protection of rights, based on community needs and priorities
An energy transition can only be just if it considers and remedies its potential negative impacts, particularly on rural, local, and Indigenous communities. To achieve this, it is essential to enable community participation in the project design and assessment phases, apply robust safeguards, and ensure remedy and justice when rights are violated.

The position paper also highlights key elements of a community-driven just energy transition in the Global South: centered on human rights and community self-determination; on the protection of land, livelihoods, and food security; and driven by people and gender justice.

A call to action

These collective demands offer a roadmap toward an energy transition that leaves no one behind and is grounded in local realities, a feminist and intersectional perspective, global solidarity, and justice.
Technological change alone is not enough to make the energy transition just: a truly just transition requires centering communities in development financing decisions. We need a transformative paradigm shift that puts people and the planet first in both policy and practice.

To break away from the exploitative patterns of the fossil-fuel-based development model, all actors involved in shaping and financing the transition (states, international and multilateral organizations, public development banks, private actors, etc.) must prioritize bottom-up, community-led solutions that uphold human rights, protect ecosystems, and ensure equitable access to energy.

The full version of the Position Paper can be accessed through the following link.

Note prepared based on the publication of the Coalition for Human Rights in Development, available at: https://rightsindevelopment.org/es/news/documento-posicion-jet/

More information

Contact
Gonzalo Roza, gon.roza@fundeps.org

We took part in the working committee that is designing a draft law on access to public information for Córdoba. The initiative is part of the province’s 2nd Open Government Plan and seeks to update the regulations in force since 1999.

Last Thursday, November 13, we participated in the working committee tasked with drafting a bill on access to public information for the province of Córdoba.

This initiative is one of the commitments undertaken by the Secretariat for Open Government of the Ministry of Government of the Province of Córdoba within the framework of the 2nd Open Government Plan of the province before the Open Government Partnership (OGP). This Plan was co-designed between May and September 2024 with the participation of the Universities and Civil Society Organizations Roundtable, which includes Fundeps.

We welcome the fact that the province of Córdoba is moving forward with the design of new regulations to update Law 8,803 of 1999 on Access to Knowledge of State Acts. The current regulation requires several modifications to raise standards and guarantee this right for all citizens. It is also essential to establish institutional mechanisms that allow for its effective exercise.

Drawing on our experience and expertise, we will continue contributing to the construction of a bill that meets current demands and standards regarding access to public information and government transparency.

More Information

Contact:

Nina Sibilla, ninasibilla@fundeps.org

Fundeps once again participated in the Federal Interuniversity Chair on Community Lawyering, an initiative that brings together universities and social organizations to train legal professionals with a human rights and community-based approach.

Since 2024, the Argentine Network of Community Lawyering has coordinated the Federal Interuniversity Chair on Community Lawyering, with the participation of universities from across the country. This year, in its second edition, Fundeps is once again part of its implementation.

The Argentine Network of Community Lawyering is a federal space made up of multiple civil society organizations and activists, focused on legal empowerment. Since its creation in 2021, Fundeps has been part of the Promoting Group, through which projects centered on community lawyering have been developed. Within this framework, and together with the Latin American School of Community Lawyering and Legal Activism (ELAC), the Federal Interuniversity Chair on Community Lawyering was established.

This initiative is now in its second edition, with the aim of training legal professionals from a human rights perspective, in favor of—and alongside—individuals, communities, and collectives affected by dynamics of systemic and structural inequality and exclusion.

During the first edition, held in 2024, more than 100 students from 12 universities participated. In this new edition, the Chair is supported by 15 universities from 11 provinces and includes the participation of Latin American lecturers with extensive experience in community lawyering and human rights.

As part of the practical experiences cycle on Community Lawyering, Fundeps contributed by teaching two classes. These sessions addressed the experience of environmental litigation alongside the Lake San Roque community for the remediation of the watershed, as well as the trajectory of Law No. 27,610—from social mobilization and legislative reform to defensive litigation.

Participating in the training of legal professionals through community-based experience allows us to continue strengthening a form of lawyering that serves communities and advances the protection of human rights.

Documentary Series on Community Lawyering

In November 2025, the Argentine Network of Community Lawyering premiered the documentary series Community Lawyering. Across three episodes—Knowing the Law, Using the Law, and Transforming the Law—the production explores experiences of lawyering in the territories and shows how different initiatives put the law into action as a tool for social change.

Contact:
Luz Baretta, luzbaretta@fundeps.org

On November 17, the city of Córdoba will host the 2nd National Congress on Trans Childhoods and Adolescences, to be held at the Aula Mayor of the Provincial University of Córdoba (Teatro Ciudad de las Artes).

Organized by the civil association La Casita Trans, the event will bring together leaders, activists, families, professionals, and social organizations from across the country to discuss inclusion, support, and the rights of trans, travesti, and non-binary children and youth. The congress is self-managed and aims to promote, defend, and guarantee the rights of trans children and adolescents as a priority population.

Fundeps is proud to support and officially endorse this space, and will participate in Panel 4: “Transfeminist Strategic Litigation”, which will address experiences of legal and social transformation in defense of trans identities’ rights.

The program includes discussion panels, workshops, and spaces for care and collective creation, with topics ranging from fundamentalism and hate speech to good practices in health, education, and justice, along with artistic activities and an organizations’ fair.

In the days leading up to the event, La Casita Trans publicly denounced acts of harassment and disinformation campaigns promoted by anti-rights groups that attempted to prevent the congress from taking place. Fundeps strongly condemns these actions, which constitute forms of violence and persecution against the trans population—especially children and adolescents—and reaffirms our commitment to defending human rights, equality, and diversity.

We invite everyone interested to participate and support this initiative, which celebrates the existence and voices of trans childhoods:

📅 November 17 – Aula Mayor, Provincial University of Córdoba
📝 Registration form: click here to register.

Because trans childhoods and adolescences exist, resist, and deserve to grow up free, respected, and loved.

Contact:

Mayca Balaguer: maycabalaguer@fundeps.org

In October, Fundeps took part in two exchange spaces that centered on the relationship between universities, gender, and human rights: the 4th National Conference “Building Feminist Universities” and the meeting of the Forum of Rectors and Vice-Rectors of Public University Institutions (FoReVi-CIN).

The “Building Feminist Universities” conference, organized on November 6 and 7 by the National University of Córdoba through the Central Unit for Gender Policies and the Interuniversity Network for Gender Equality and Against Violence (RUGE-CIN), brought together representatives from universities across the country to reflect on the present and future of gender policies in higher education. Under the slogan “Weave, Resist, Persist: Gender Policies Built Through Networks,” the event reaffirmed its federal and interuniversity character, calling for collective efforts to sustain progress made and to envision more inclusive universities committed to human rights.

Within this framework, Fundeps participated in the presentation “Feminist Litigation as a Pedagogical Strategy: A Training Proposal in the Law Degree Program at UNC,” sharing the experience of the elective course Feminist Litigation: Legal Strategies for Gender Equality. The course, which has been offered for three years, is taught by an interdisciplinary team composed of professors and researchers from the Faculty of Law and the Institute for Studies on Law, Justice, and Society (IDEJUS), Catholics for the Right to Decide, Fundeps, and other practicing lawyers and members of the judiciary.

This initiative seeks to rethink legal education from a feminist and intersectional perspective, promoting critical analysis of legislation and jurisprudence, the design of legal strategies with a gender equality approach, and the articulation between academia, civil society, and the judiciary.

Likewise, as part of the UNC’s Social Advisory Council, Fundeps participated in the meeting of the Forum of Rectors and Vice-Rectors of the National Interuniversity Council (FoReVi-CIN), held on November 6 at the Evita Museum – Ferreyra Palace, under the theme “Education and Employment with a Gender Perspective.” This space brought together university authorities, business leaders, and social organization representatives with the goal of strengthening ties between academic institutions and social actors to promote inclusive and violence-free educational and work environments.

These spaces are key to deepening dialogue between civil society and public universities and to continuing to build feminist perspectives within the educational system—recognizing the transformative role of education in promoting gender equality and human rights.

Tobacco use continues to be one of the main risk factors for disease, disability, and preventable death in Argentina. Meanwhile, the tobacco industry is shifting its strategy toward new products—such as electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products—in an effort to maintain its market and evade existing regulations.

In response to this situation, the InterAmerican Heart Foundation (FIC Argentina), together with AsAT, ETESA IECS, GRANTAHI from the Italian Hospital, UATA, FEIM, Fundeps, Fundación Sales, Fundación Pacientes Cáncer de Pulmón, and CEDES, developed the document “Emerging products and health damage: Situation in Argentina and recommendations.” Its aim is to systematize the available scientific evidence and propose concrete measures to protect public health.

Current scientific evidence shows that emerging products are not harmless. A recent meta-analysis found that the risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, and metabolic dysfunction is similar between users of electronic cigarettes and those who smoke conventional cigarettes. In addition, other reviews have reported links to pneumonia, bronchitis, decreased sperm count, dizziness, headaches, migraines, and oral cavity damage. The document also highlights that dual use (electronic and conventional cigarettes) increases disease risk, and that studies suggesting otherwise often come from authors with conflicts of interest.

A gateway to tobacco use:
Available data in Argentina are clear:

  • According to the Global Youth Tobacco Survey (2018), 7.1% of adolescents aged 13 to 15 used electronic cigarettes.
  • A more recent survey conducted in 2023 by FIC Argentina found that 8.9% of adolescents in Buenos Aires are current users of these products.
    These results confirm that emerging products can serve as a gateway to tobacco use, even among adolescents who had never smoked before.

No more, no less—just another form of harm:
The most accurate way to understand the impact of vaping is as a different risk, not necessarily a lower one.
A true harm reduction strategy should be implemented by health authorities, aim to protect public health, and focus on specific groups—not rely on the free commercialization of harmful products.

The signatory organizations recommend:

  • Strengthening the enforcement of current regulations.
  • Coordinating actions among public agencies to improve oversight and sanctions.
  • Promoting cooperation with civil society organizations free from conflicts of interest to reduce tobacco and nicotine use.

Electronic cigarettes are not a safe alternative. They pose a different kind of risk, with growing evidence of their impact on health and their role in initiating tobacco use. Protecting the health of the population—especially children and adolescents—requires decisions based on independent evidence, free from industry influence.

Read the full document at LINK.

We got the courts to demand that the State clean up the lake. Now we need your support to make it happen. Your contribution is the drop that changes the lake.

Lake San Roque is more than just a landscape: it’s a source of water, life, and work for millions of people in Córdoba. Today, it needs us. For decades, it has been polluted to the point where its water is no longer safe. But in April 2025, the courts acknowledged the environmental damage and ordered the State to carry out a comprehensive cleanup plan. This was the result of years of technical and legal work by Fundeps, together with the support of neighbors, communities, and organizations who live by and defend the lake.

It’s a historic achievement. What once seemed impossible begins with a single drop. And what comes next depends on you.

A ruling that changed everything

The court ruling for the comprehensive cleanup of Lake San Roque recognizes the right to a healthy environment and demands that provincial and municipal authorities implement concrete measures to restore the basin. It was the result of years of joint effort: collecting scientific evidence and historical documentation, preparing technical reports, attending hearings, conducting expert evaluations, and continuous monitoring.

But rulings don’t enforce themselves. They require oversight, citizen participation, and constant presence to turn words on paper into real action.

What is Fundeps doing now?

Our legal and technical team continues to follow every step of the process closely:

  • We request regular reports and submit observations.

  • We monitor compliance with the ruling and the cleanup plan.

  • We demand transparency and citizen participation.

  • We support the communities around the basin.

  • We work to empower communities so they can demand the ruling’s enforcement.

Your contribution is the drop that changes the lake

The Drop That Changes the Lake is a campaign of individual donors that helps sustain this work, ensure that the ruling is enforced, and make the cleanup of San Roque a reality. Every contribution —big or small— helps fund legal and technical monitoring and strengthens citizen oversight to protect Córdoba’s water and environment.

Without follow-up, the ruling could remain just words on paper. Your donation helps turn this historic decision into safe water. Today, you can be the drop that changes the future of the lake.

Drop by drop, change grows. When drops come together, they form a current strong enough to achieve the impossible: bringing life back to Lake San Roque. When a community unites, even the smallest action becomes powerful.

Your contribution is the drop that changes the lake. And every drop counts.

Fundeps participated in the 8th CLACAI Regional Conference in Bogotá, a space that brought together organizations and activists from Latin America and the Caribbean to collectively reflect on current challenges and regional strategies to guarantee the right to abortion.

Between October 30 and November 1, Fundeps took part in the 8th Regional Conference of the Latin American Consortium against Unsafe Abortion (CLACAI), held in Bogotá, Colombia, under the theme “The Horizons of the Right to Abortion.”

The event brought together nearly 400 participants from Latin America and the Caribbean, including activists, health professionals, lawyers, researchers, and representatives of social organizations working to promote access to safe abortion and sexual, reproductive, and non-reproductive rights across the region.

Throughout the conference, key institutional and social challenges were addressed in the context of setbacks in sexual and reproductive rights. Participants shared strategies for regional litigation and advocacy, experiences of innovation in service provision, and feminist accompaniment practices. The importance of coordination among Global South movements to sustain and expand hard-won rights was also emphasized.

As part of the program, Fundeps participated in the meeting of CLACAI’s Legal Network. It also took part in parallel sessions on Research for Action, aimed at strengthening evidence generation and monitoring to improve service quality, and on Abortion after 20 Weeks, where regional experiences and guidelines for humane and comprehensive care in cases of advanced pregnancies were shared.

CLACAI highlighted that the conference made it possible to bring together diverse voices from across the region around a common goal: guaranteeing universal access to legal, safe, and high-quality abortion in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Fundeps’ participation in this space reaffirms its commitment to the defense of sexual and reproductive rights, the exchange of knowledge across territories, and the construction of collective strategies to improve regional and global access to these rights.

Contact:
Mayca Balaguer, maycabalaguer@fundeps.org

Within the framework of World Food Day, civil society organizations are warning about another potential setback to the Law for the Promotion of Healthy Eating, stemming from ongoing negotiations within MERCOSUR.

In April of this year, the Common Market Group (GMC) instructed Working Subgroup No. 3 to resume negotiations for a Technical Regulation on Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling, with the goal of harmonizing regulations among member countries of the bloc. If approved, this regulation would include, among other elements, the unification of a graphic warning system and a nutrient profile model (NPM).

If such a regulation is adopted, MERCOSUR countries would be required to adapt their national front-of-package labeling standards to align with the bloc’s decision. It is important to highlight that Argentina currently has the most robust front-of-package labeling system in the region. If, during the harmonization process, elements from other countries’ systems were incorporated, the local regulation would be seriously weakened. Adopting lower standards would represent a step backward in the protection of the right to health, adequate nutrition, and access to information in our country.

Why is this a threat?

  • Argentina’s front-of-package labeling system warns about a greater number of excessive critical nutrients than those used in other countries.

  • It is the only one that includes precautionary statements for caffeine and sweeteners, warning against their consumption by children and adolescents.

  • The Argentine system is based on the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) Nutrient Profile Model, which covers many more unhealthy products than those addressed by other national models.

For these reasons, we call for any future harmonization within MERCOSUR to fully adopt the Argentine system, to prevent the weakening of the Labeling Law and the resulting setback in public health protection. We urge Argentine representatives to defend the rights that have been achieved.

Within this context, together with other civil society organizations, we are relaunching the campaign “Don’t Cover Our Eyes”, first developed in 2021, now with the goal of raising awareness about the need to defend the law against these threats.

Furthermore, as part of collaborative work with various academic and civil society organizations across the region, regional institutions from Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay have recently issued a joint statement, recognizing the Argentine system as the model to follow for a potential common technical regulation on front-of-package labeling.

Organizations committed to the right to food from different MERCOSUR countries will participate as observers in the upcoming Working Subgroup No. 3 meeting, to be held in October, to closely monitor the progress of these discussions.

More information:

Contact:
Maga Merlo — magamerlov@fundeps.org