We presented amicus curiae before the Inter-American Court in the case “Beatriz vs. The Savior”
On April 4, we appeared as amicus curiae before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, in the case “Beatriz vs. El Salvador”, in which the violations of the rights of Beatriz and her family are denounced due to the absolute prohibition of voluntary interruption of pregnancy in that country.
“Below, we offer a google translate version of the original article in Spanish. This translation may not be accurate but serves as a general presentation of the article. For more accurate information, please switch to the Spanish version of the website. In addition, feel free to directly contact in English the person mentioned at the bottom of this article with regards to this topic”.
Beatriz was 22 years old in 2013, when she demanded access to a therapeutic abortion before the courts of El Salvador, since her life was at risk due to having an anencephalic pregnancy (without a brain), with no chance of survival, added to a series of previous illnesses. The abortion request was finally denied by the Salvadoran courts.
Given this refusal from the Constitutional Chamber of that country, the organizations that accompanied the young woman took the case to the Inter-American Human Rights System, and both the Commission and the Court respectively granted precautionary and provisional measures. On June 3, Beatriz began labor, so she had to undergo a cesarean section. The anencephalic fetus died five hours later. The event had wide international repercussions due to the tragedy and violation of rights it meant.
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) determined that El Salvador was responsible for the violation of Beatriz’s rights and recommended that the State adopt measures to guarantee real access to abortion in situations where the fetus is not viable with extrauterine life. and risk to the health and life of the mother. In January 2022, the case was elevated to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
One of the axes of our work is the promotion of the human rights of women and other identities, such as the right to health. In addition, we have actively participated through communication campaigns and political advocacy activities in the process of legislative discussion and subsequent sanction of the national Law 27,610 on Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy in Argentina.
Through our amicus, in addition to maintaining that there has been an impact on the human right to health in light of international law, we seek to contribute our experience as an organization that works on the issue in Argentina, maintaining that the criminalization of abortion is a form of violence against women, and that the criminalization of abortion is a deficient response by States. Therefore, there is a need to review the restrictive legislation that still exists in other countries in the region.
In this sense, it has been shown that laws that prohibit abortion do not reduce the number of abortions that are performed. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), nearly 6.5 million abortions are performed annually in Latin America and the Caribbean, despite the fact that in most countries in the region abortion is illegal or strongly restricted. . The criminalization of abortion only makes the procedures clandestine and unsafe, which puts women’s health and lives at risk.
The Inter-American Court has the opportunity to establish an important precedent in this case, confirming that the absolute criminalization of abortion is a violation of human rights and that States have the obligation to guarantee access to safe and legal abortion in certain circumstances. We hope that the Court gives rise to what was proposed by the Commission and sends a clear message to the States of the region about the need to protect the human rights of women and other identities with the capacity to bear children.
Author
Vanina Piccardo
Contact
Mayca Balaguer, maycabalaguer@fundeps.org
