The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights published their findings and recommendations for Argentina.

The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), a monitoring body of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights published its findings and recommendations for Argentina in a process that contained a preliminary report carried out by the Argentine State and various shadow reports from civil society organisations, which can be seen in the list of documents attached to this Committee meeting.

Las recomendaciones del Comité de DESC para ArgentinaFUNDEPS, in collaboration with the Argentine Inter-American Heart Foundation and the O’Neill Institute for International and Global Health Law will present a shadow report focusing on the need to strengthen tobacco regulation in order to act against the serious consequences that smoking creates in Argentina. The report titled: “Tobacco Control in Argentina: progress and further challenges’’ is available on the Committee’s official website:

It should be noted that, taking this report into account, the Committee carried out specific recommendations for tobacco control in the following way: “The Committee recommends the State party to ratify the WHO Framework Convention for Tobacco Control and develop fiscal policies, pricing and raising people’s awareness in order to effectively reduce smoking, in particular among women and young people.”

As well as this, we highlight other recommendations related to the right to access adequate housing:

– The Committee urges the State party to ratify housing policies in order to guarantee everyone has access to adequate and affordable housing, with legal security of tenure.
– Furthermore, the State party is encouraged to fight effectively against speculation in the housing market, in land use and construction, taking into account its General Comment No.4 (1991), related to the right to access adequate housing.
-The Committee also urges the State party to adopt specific measures, legislative or other, so that people who have been victims of forced eviction can get alternative housing or fair and just compensation in accordance with the provisions in the General Comment No. 7 (1997), relating to forced evictions.

More information:

Observaciones finales del Comité de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales para Argentina
(Concluding observations from the The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights for Argentina)

Contact:

info@fundeps.org

Translated by: Rachel Henderson

As part of an NGO Coalition from Argentina, that submitted a document to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Fundeps presented questions linked to the right to adequate housing.

Within the framework of the third reporting process to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, a group of NGOs submitted a paper with initial questions for the State of Argentina.  These questions will be addressed by the working group prior to the sessions taking place from 23 to 27 May 2011 in Geneva.  After this first discussion forum the Committee, in exercise of the duties enshrined in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), will submit a report of compliance with the obligations of this Covenant on behalf of Argentina. (The working agenda and reference materials, including that developed by this NGO alliance, can be found on the Committee website.)

A group of Argentine NGOs, coordinated by the Centre for Legal and Social Studies (CELS), developed this document raising deeper questions in response to the first report submitted on behalf of the Republic of Argentina.  The questions particularly relate to rights recognised by the ICESCR such as labour rights, the right to education, the right to health or the right of access to adequate housing.  Each of these rights are effectively Human Rights which generate corresponding obligations on the part of the Argentine State.  The document seeks further information regarding the actions taken by the State and draws the Committee’s attention to situations that involve violations of these rights.

The contribution from FUNDEPS was made in respect of access to adequate housing (ICESCR Article 11).  This section sets out, for example, that “the evictions are facilitated by a combination of policies that were already questioned by the ESCR Committee in their recommendations to the Argentine State in 1999.  Not only were these policies not modified but many provinces took inspiration from them in order to sanction measures which facilitate evictions in their own regions”.  Furthermore, it describes another problem in the sense that “in many cases, the location of social housing reinforces the residential segregation of the most disadvantaged sectors of society, depriving them of access to quality infrastructures and urban facilities”.  It is suggested that “in order to develop inclusive and sustainable housing policies and to control the price of land and rents, it is vital to adopt a national planning and land use law and to regulate the right to private property”.

Finally, some of the questions in this section include:

1. What conventions determine the location of the new house building schemes in the framework of the Federal Housing Plan?  What criteria are used to assign the housing and to decide the geographical distribution of the plan?

5.  What measures does the State intend to adopt to limit the anticipated evictions under the procedural policies which govern civil eviction procedures and the offence of usurpation?

6. What measures does the Argentine State plan to adopt in order to avoid families being left on the streets by the evictions?

Documents:

– Informe paralelo de ONGs al Comité de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales

Informe elevado por Argentina al Comité de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales

Contact:

Martín Juárez Ferrer

Director – Clínica Jurídica de Fundeps

martinjuarezf@fundeps.org

Translated by: Katherine Wingfield-Dobbs

The Córdoba Transparent Program deployed a local election observation mission that developed media content showing different aspects of the election day.

Delays in the arrival of the FIPE (Institute of Economic Research Foundation) to the polls Study of the single ballot used in the municipal elections of Córdoba Election Day from within

Contact:

César Murúa / Executive Director
cmurua@fundeps.org

Translated by Robyn Franklin

The Cordoba Transparente programme (an initiative carried out in conjunction with the foundation citizens 365 and FUNDEPS) presents it’s electoral mission report developed during the last elections in the province of Cordoba, Argentina.

In the context of the election of local authorities in Cordoba, the Cordoba Transparente programme (carried out in conjunction with the foundation citizens 365 and FUNDEPS) launched an Electoral Observation Mission with a double aim. On the one hand it monitors the functioning of a new electoral system, which is the result of a political reform put in place in 2008. On the other hand, it looks at consolidation of democracy, through an independent domestic electoral observation, a practice that is completely new in our province. This helps to us to progress further down the road that the electoral observation in Marcos Juarez started us on in 2010.

Following on from this, we present a Final Report on Electoral Observation that has been put together under the agreement reached by our own institutions and the judicial powers of the region, under the general guidelines for experiences and electoral observation missions of nationals and non-nationals approved by the regulatory agreement 1066/A of the high court of justice. The independent domestic electoral observation is for institutes lacking regulation in the electoral regime in Cordoba. As a consequence, The Cordoba Transparente initiative has put in place, the formalisation of a practice that we trust will over time consolidate and multiply between independent organisations in a serious and responsible way. Some of the most important general observations that are elaborated on in the report as follows:

  • Key delays in the opening of homes were created.
  • When they receive the vote, the authorities found themselves with unfinished items.
  • The electoral rolls that were taken in the establishment were not visible or hadn’t even been placed inside the school.
  • In the schools that were observed (throughout the region, where it was possible to know) the press were denied Access to the establishments at the time of vote counting.
  • Worries over the distribution of polls on the vote at 11am and at 5pm by local poll companies. Means of communication replicate the information at 6pm, worsening the infringement.

In particular, regarding the electronic vote, the current report presents a comparison of the systems used in Marcos Juarez in 2010 and La Falda in 2011, two cases that were both observed by the Cordoba Transparente Programme. The new system responds to the objections linked to the possibility of tracking voting, with the consequent threat to the secrecy of the vote. On the other hand, technicians within the licensed company acted as de facto attorneys at a time when there was no investigation of the source code of the software used, information that was not provided to politicians, attorneys or electoral observers. The following are a few more observations:

  • The first objection is linked to the choosing of the location to implement the new voting mechanism. The citizens of Marcos Juarez need to learn to use the electronic vote in 2010 and then ‘unlearn’ the system to qualify as a single ticket.
  • As they have already indicated, the citizens think there has been insufficient training, which is evidence of the difficulties that some voters are facing
  • The training via simulations of electronic voting carried out in the same school, on the same day of voting, used official images of the candidates, which motivated questioning amongst voters (asked directly to the Cordoba Transparente observers) regarding the risk that this entails for the secrecy of the vote. In light of this, the company says that proper electoral justice had imposed these conditions of simulation.
  • Experts in the company MSA are reconsulting with electoral public attorneys who require a revision of privatisation of the electoral system if they are hoping to put electronic voting in place throughout the region.
  • If the technical errors were minor (imperfections to do with the chips, ballots, or printing) work must be done on the details of the system for a possible large scale application
  • The source code of the software that the machines use was not integrated with political parties, electronic taxes, or the observers of Cordoba Transparente when they asked. To audit this, the parties could only do it when accompanied by MSA technicians. No party audited the source code.

More information:

Informe Final de Observacion Electoral

Contacto:

César Múrua / Director Ejecutivo

cmurua@fundeps.org

Translated by Luke Sidaway

#CBAvota #boletaunicaCBA This coming Sunday 7th August, report on what you see at your polling station and tell us about your experience using the new Boleta Única voting system (where voters receive one ballot paper showing the names of all candidates, as opposed to the old system where voters would receive a separate ballot paper for each candidate). You can do this through your Twitter account or by sending an SMS to 351 2581379. 

Next Sunday, 7th August, provincial authorities will be elected across Córdoba for the first time using the new Boleta Única voting system, as well as an electronic vote pilot to be tried out in La Falda. On that day, the Córdoba Transparente programme (a joint initiative between FUNDEPS and Ciudadanos 365) will reveal its domesticElectoral Observation Mission.

Non-governmental organisations have been authorised for the first time to take charge of the electoral observation process in Córdoba. Córdoba Transparente’s observation team will invigilate the running of the polling booths which will be using the electronic vote in La Falda and the Boleta Única voting system in other localities of the province, gauging the electorate’s perceptions in the use of these voting methods. They’ll also be present at the counting centres in La Falda and Feriar to monitor the scrutinising processes there.

Voters’ observation of the new system

To complement the work carried out by the observation team, we would like to invite all voters to become electoral observers themselves on polling day by using your mobile phones and social networks. By sending us an SMS to 351 2581379 or by posting on our Twitter account (with the hashtags #CBAvota y #boletaunicaCBA) all citizens will be able to report on what they witness at their polling station and tell us about their experience of using the Boleta Única voting system.

We aim to complement the work carried out by the electoral observation team with the perspective of every citizen, meaning we’ll all be contributing to a transparent and democratic process. The lessons learned from this experience will be implemented in October’s national elections.

How to report via SMS? (without additional charges)

It’s really simple, all you have to do is send us an SMS to 351 2581379 with your report, indicating your polling station. Your SMS reports are received via the FrontlineSMS system and posted anonymously on the @CBAvota Twitter account.

In order to receive a reminder on polling day, you have to send us an SMS with the word VOTO before Sunday.

To avoid your report being posted on the @CBAvota Twitter account, you must precede your message with the wordNOPUBLICAR.

If an SMS was sent to you in error and you don’t wish to receive anything else from the number 351 2581379, reply with the word DESUSCRIBIR.

What can citizens report to us?

Problems getting the polling booths open on time;

Delays in casting votes;

Difficulties in using the Boleta Única voting system;

Propaganda used by a candidate or the use of party emblems;

Orientation or inducement to vote a certain way;

Hampering of the vote;

The absence of election officials at the polling station, etc.

We also invite you to make any other comments relating to the electoral process and use of the Boleta Única voting system.

To find out more about the elections: www.eleccionescordoba.com.ar – http://www.eleccionescordoba.com.ar/ is where you can look up where to vote (Electoral Register) and have a go on a Boleta Única simulator.

Translated by Thomas Mcguinn

The social and cultural economic rights Committee has published a list of issues that should be considered when examining the third periodic report on Argentina, highlighting questions on the access to adequate housing.

Continuing in the process of analysing and reporting on the obligations of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) the DESC committee published a document listing the issues that should be tackled when examining the third periodic report on Argentina. In the development of this document, the Committee recalled the presentations carried out by civil society organisations, such as the general document coordinated by the Centre of Legal and Social Studies (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales-CELS-) in which FUNDEPS worked with the recommendations and questions regarding the right to access adequate housing.

In the recently published document, the Committee puts questions to the Argentine government regarding the general obligations of the pact and the specific rights that were promised to be guaranteed. Regarding the right to access to adequate housing, some questions put forth by FUNDEPS in the text presented by the Argentine NGO Alliance ( Alianza de ONGs de Argentina) stand out. In the text, it was stated that “the federal state has, in the last seven year, executed a housing policy on a larger scale than in previous policies, the scope and effectivity of this policy are limited. Equally, there is little clarity regarding the criteria used to decide whether to build in one jurisdiction and not another” As such, enquiries were made into a national housing policy and its articulation on different levels. Additionally, there were questions in the document regarding “the precautions the Argentine state will adopt to avoid evictions leaving families out on the street”, something that is also suggested by the Committee when questioning whether their general comment 7 is being fulfilled. A comment that, amongst other recommendations, states that “evictions that leave people without housing and exposed to the violation of other human rights should not take place.” Below, we present some of the questions submitted by the DESC Committee to the Argentine government.

Initial Information and General Dispositions of the Pact.

Please notify the Committee if the party state is considering the possibility of ratifying the First Optional Protocol of the Pact

Please provide the last available statistical data on the socioeconomic situation of indigenous peoples, particularly on the impact of poverty, life expectancy, literacy rates and access to employment.

Please notify if the party state has implemented their public policies and/or action plans to modify and eliminate attitudes, cultural practices, ingrained stereotypes and discrimination against women in the party state and provide information on its implementation where applicable.

Specific Dispositions of the Pact

The Right to Work

Please provide current and broken down data on employment in the informal sector, with an indication of the policies, programmes and measures adopted by the party state to assure access to basic services and social protection of those employed in this sector, particularly women.

The Right to the Enjoyment of Equitable and Satisfactory Working Conditions

Measures carried out by the party state to guarantee the right to the enjoyment of equitable and satisfactory working conditions in the informal sector, including migrants who find themselves in an irregular situation and especially regarding women.

Union Rights

Please clarify if the right to strike, enshrined in the Constitution, is fully guarantee in practice and if it can be exercised by all registered unions, regardless of their position in accordance with the Law of trade union associations

Protection of Family, Mothers and Children.

Please describe the planned or adopted measures to prevent situations of forced labour, especially in the textile industry in rural areas.

The Right to Access to Adequate Housing

Please provide up to date information on the measures adopted by the party state to guarantee that evictions are carried out in accordance with international principles and directives and general comment No 7 (1997) of the Committee regarding the right to adequate housing: forced eviction.

Please clarify if there is an existing national housing policy and if it includes the principles of the right to adequate housing, including culturally appropriate alternatives for indigenous peoples.

Please provide information on the measures adopted by the party state to improve access to water and sanitation that is insufficient in quantity and quality in rural areas.

The Right to Physical and Mental Health

Please formulate comments on teenage pregnancy rates, secret abortions and sexually transmitted diseases in the party state and provide information on the measures carried out by the party state to guarantee that teenagers have access to public sexual and reproductive healthcare services and a comprehensive sexual education.

The Right to Education

Please provide information on the concrete measures adopted to tackle elevated disparity in the access to primary school education and the subsequent educational levels between the City of Buenos Aires (Federal Capital) and the rest of the country.

Documents:

Observación General 7: El derecho a una vivienda adecuada: los desalojos forzosos

–  Comité DESC: Listado de temas a abordarse en el examen del tercer informe periódico de la Argentina

FUNDEPS participa en el X Congreso Nacional de Ciencia Política.

El pasado viernes 29 de julio, Juan Camusso (FUNDEPS) y Hernán Charosky (Poder Ciudadano) expusieron sobre diferentes experiencias y estrategias de incidencia de la sociedad civil en políticas públicas.

Fundeps presents the Annual Report of its activities in 2010, making a balance of the main challenges, achievements, activities and lessons learned in its work in 2010.

The spanish version of this article is presented below. You can download a spanish version of the report here. For more information in English contact: Ana Estefanía Carballo at aecarballo@fundeps.org.


Presentamos el informe resumen de las actividades de Fundeps en el 2010, año en el que logramos consolidar muchos proyectos en cada una de nuestras áreas de trabajo.

Área de Gobernanza Democrática

  • Accesibilidad y Transparencia
  • Promoción de los Principios de Acceso en la Ley de Bosques de Córdoba – Iniciativa de Acceso, Coalición Argentina
  • Monitoreo Electoral

Área de Acceso a la Justicia

  • Clínica de Derecho de Interés Público
  • Incidencia por un Código de Faltas que cumpla con las obligaciones de Derechos Humanos y las garantías constitucionales

Área de Fortalecimiento de la Sociedad Civil

  • Fortalecimiento de marco legal para Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil
  • Acompañamiento al proyecto de Oficina de Diálogo con el Parlamento

Cómo comenta César Murúa, Director Ejecutivo de Fundeps, “todo balance es una fotografía del momento. La imagen que este informe proyecta sobre las actividades de Fundeps en el último año puede sintetizarse del siguiente modo: tres resultados de impacto de nuestros proyectos, dos lecciones aprendidas sobre cómo alcanzar objetivos institucionales o comunitarios, algunas satisfacciones a nivel institucional y principalmente un anhelo que impulsa nuestro compromiso para trabajar por una sociedad mejor, más justa, participativa e inclusiva”. En el informe, se analiza con detalle cada uno de estos puntos y se encuentra información respecto a las actividades, logros, equipos de trabajo, socios y redes.

Deseamos aprovechar esta instancia de balance para agradecer la colaboración de voluntarios, el acompañamiento de medios de comunicación, la apertura a la cooperación de otras organizaciones, la confianza de donantes y especialmente el interés de muchas personas en nuestro trabajo.

Documento: Informe de actividades 2010

Desde FUNDEPS se hace un balance del proceso de reglamentación de la ley nacional de protección de bosque nativo que diera lugar a una normativa provincial que no respeta los estándares de protección fijados por la propia ley de presupuestos mínimos.

Desde 2009, la Fundación para el Desarrollo de Políticas Sustentables (FUNDEPS) ha estado participando en el proceso de Ordenamiento Territorial de Bosques Nativos de Córdoba en el marco de la Coalición Argentina por el Acceso a la Información (The Access Iniciative), junto a las organizaciones CEDHA (Centro de Derechos Humanos y Ambiente), FOCO (Foro de Participación Ciudadano por la Justicia y los Derechos Humanos) y OAJNU (Organización Argentina de Jóvenes para las Naciones Unidas). Desde la Coalición, FUNDEPS ha buscado promover la participación ciudadana en la legislación sobre bosques nativos, sumándose a la Comisión de Ordenamiento Territorial de Bosques Nativos (COTBN). Con su trabajo buscó incorporar al proyecto de ordenamiento territorial disposiciones respecto al acceso a la información ambiental y a la convocatoria de audiencias públicas. FUNDEPS presenta un documento de trabajo que describe los diferentes pasos desarrollados en el marco de ese proceso de reglamentación de la ley nacional.

A pesar de los esfuerzos de amplios sectores de la sociedad civil, lamentablemente, las presiones, los intereses y el desmonte del gobierno provincial –de la mano del ruralismo- ganaron el proceso de ordenamiento de bosques nativos en Córdoba en 2010 y la regulación violenta derechos constitucionales amparando intereses de unos pocos. La sanción de esa norma motivo numerosas quejas por parte de los movimientos y organizaciones activas durante el el proceso de discusión y llevó, finalmente, a que la Universidad Nacional de Río IV presentara un pedido de declaración de inconstitucionalidad de diversos artículos de la ley.

Este retroceso respecto a la protección de los bosques en Córdoba contrasta, por ejemplo, con la decisión de la Asamblea General de Naciones Unidas de declarar año internacional de los bosques al 2011, como un modo de concientizar sobre la importancia de este recurso natural.

Desde FUNDEPS esperamos que no se sigan desaprovechando las oportunidades para valorar los bosques como recurso estratégico y que se respeten plenamente los derechos de las comunidades vinculados con ellos.

Contacto:
César Murúa / Director Ejecutivo
cmurua@fundeps.org

Documento:
– FUNDEPS – Documento de Trabajo – Balance del proceso de reglamentación de la ley nacional de protección de bosques nativos en la Provincia de Córdoba. ¿Y ahora qué? – Enero de 2011

In 2010, FUNDEPS is created, a result from the work of young professionals from Córdoba, Argentina.

The Foundation for the Development of Sustainable Policy (FUNDEPS) is a non for profit organisation developed in Argentina with a focus on the development of a just, equitable and inclusive society. We envision the construction of strategies in which every stakeholder of the society will engage in the promotion of sustainable processes of widening of opportunities and the strengthening of democratic institutions that will ensure the full respect of Human Rights, building a sustainable development policy.

To contribute to the development of these strategies, FUNDEPS works for the establishment of improved relations, rules and institutions in the interactions among the government, the citizenry, the private sector as well as other civil society organizations from the local, national and international level.

To achieve these goals, FUNDEPS promotes the empowerment of the different stakeholders in the development process through initiatives of training, lobbying, policy & research, strategic litigation and cooperation.

Fundeps is part of The Argentine Coalition of The Access Initiative (TAI), together with CEDHA, OAJNU and FOCO.


Fundeps joins The Access Initiative Coalition to work in the promotion of Access Principles in the Law for Forestry Protection in Argentina.

The Access Initiative (TAI) is a global network that promotes access to information, participation, and justice in environmental decision-making. TAI is the world’s largest network of civil society organizations working to ensure that people have the right and ability to influence decisions about the natural resources that sustain their communities.

At the moment, the TAI Argentine Coalition is working in the Provincial Congress, advocating for the inclusion of the Access Principles in the Law that is currently being discussed in this field. The project is being developed by the Argentine Coalition of The Access Initiative, formed by FUNDEPS, together with the Argentine Youth Organization for the United Nations (OAJNU), the Citizen Assembly for Justice and Human Rights (FOCO) and the Center for Human Rights and Environment (CEDHA) with the Support from the World Resources Institute.