• ES
  • EN
Fundeps
  • About Fundeps
  • Team
  • Working areas
    • Environment
    • Democracy
    • Gender
    • Global Gorvernance
    • Health
  • News
  • Publications
  • DONATE
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Environment, Global Governance, News

Repeated figurine: garbage, conflicts and San Roque lake

The project “Centro Ambiental Carlos Paz” presents serious irregularities and violates environmental regulations and participation. It would affect Lake San Roque and would not be a definitive regional solution to the historical problem related to the integral management of solid urban waste.

“Below, we offer a google translate version of the original article in Spanish. This translation may not be accurate but serves as a general presentation of the article. For more accurate information, please switch to the Spanish version of the website. In addition, feel free to directly contact in English the person mentioned at the bottom of this article with regards to this topic”

 In the province of Cordoba, our officials continue to fail to provide an adequate and committed response to the problem of solid urban waste management. As in the elaboration of many other public policies deaf ears are made to the recommendations of science, technology and the needs of the citizens.

The management of urban solid waste is considered one of the main environmental problems of our society. And as a consequence of this, Argentina has an Integrated Management Program for Urban Solid Waste (GIRSU) -AR-L1151 financed by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB).

The Program finances works for the integral management of urban solid waste (MSW) and the recovery of degraded areas due to the poor disposition of such residues. The total cost of the program is 150 million dollars within the same is the Environmental Center Villa Carlos Paz, whose name is already biased since it would be more accurate to talk about a landfill. A landfill is a place destined to the final disposition of trash, in which multiple measures are taken to reduce the impacts to the environment. In short, it seeks to reduce and isolate waste and develop mechanisms to treat liquids and gases produced by the decomposition of organic matter.

The questioned Environmental Center Villa Carlos Paz pretends to be a landfill where there is now an open dump. The autoconvocado neighborhood group, opposes the construction of the landfill in the selected place and approved by the Secretariat of Environment and Climate Change of Cordoba. Since the beginning of this year we are working together with neighbors and neighbors of the area. The reasons why we require the relocation of this project of more than 200 million pesos are varied. The guidelines of science and technology have not been followed for the elaboration and construction of this type of works and are violating environmental norms and citizen participation.

First, the environmental impact study (EIA) presents inconsistencies.

* Probable outdated baseline studies: There is a high probability of a mismatch of baseline description of water quality, soil, air as a function of the behavior of natural and environmental variables and impacts evaluated . The exact date of its elaboration is not known, but the EIA was presented by TecnoMak S.A. On March 30, 2015, had an opinion of the Technical Interdisciplinary Committee on February 29, 2016 and was submitted to a public hearing on April 6 of that year. In this context, both for the instance of citizen participation and for the execution of the work, the study was done in a context that is not the current one.

* Lack of clarity on the basis for the selection of the location of the work: it is objectionable the justification of the choice of the farm to carry out the works. To carry out the project TecnoMak S.A. Considered three possible properties, however it is unknown the fundamentals by which it was chosen for its location in the building of the current open dump. Neither are the reasons why the other two alternatives were ruled out.

* Possible impacts to the lake and a reserve: The situation is aggravated by the fact that it is intended to build a few meters from Lake San Roque on land that may have a greater propensity to seep or leach into the water and adjoining a protected natural area Natural Reserve La Calera).

* Use of outdated census data: The EIA uses data from the 2008 national population census, with one being carried out in 2010, which shows considerable changes in the number of inhabitants of the area.

Secondly, the resolutions of the administration that establish the useful life of the project are not clear. The first opinion of the Interdisciplinary Technical Commission of the Environment Secretariat (February 29, 2016) suggests that “the draft module for the final disposal of MSW will be maximum for a use of six years.” It also recommends that the use of the module for the final disposal of RSU receives only the waste from the town of Villa Carlos Paz. Following the public hearing held on April 6, 2016, and without public prefeasibility studies, a second opinion of the ITC decided to extend the useful life of the project to twenty years, as well as the number of communes reached To the towns of Villa Río Icho Cruz, Mayu Sumaj, Cuesta Blanca, Tala Huasi, Cabalango and Malagueño. In summary, the reasons for which this decision was taken are not known, the plane with the exact coordinates where the Landfill and the total number of projected modules.

Thirdly, the right to participation of citizens living within the area of ​​influence of the project was affected. The art. 67 of Law 10,208 establishes that the public hearing process must be carried out in the area of ​​influence of the project and open participation. In this case, the public hearing was convened only in Villa Carlos Paz (Department of Punilla), and one of the areas most affected by the proximity of the property is the municipality of Malagueño, belonging to the Department of Santa Maria. In addition, the possibility of convening a popular consultation was not foreseen, considering the possible categorization of the project as having a high environmental complexity (article 68, law 10,208).

This alarming project has an environmental license approved by the Ministry of Environment of the Province, and the EIA has not been prepared in strict compliance with the current regulatory framework. Socio-environmental conflict is imminent and works can begin at any time.

The excessive growth in the volume of waste in today’s society is endangering the capacity of nature to maintain our needs and those of future generations. Population and consumption grow, and as a consequence, also the amount of garbage we generate. The problem is that the space does not grow and that we are not giving the right treatment.

We have submitted requests for information to the Secretary of Environment of the Province of Córdoba, the Municipality of Malagueño and the Municipality of Villa Carlos Paz. In addition, on May 8, we approached a note to IDB officials in Argentina responsible for following up on the program by letting us know about these concerns.

We demand transparency, accountability and coherence in government acts. We need integral and long-term solutions for the integral management of solid urban waste. Our officials are obliged to comply with current standards and to ensure that human rights and the environment are respected. It is not possible to make decisions democratically at any cost and regardless of the conditions.

More information

  • Advances and challenges in the Villa Carlos Paz Environmental Center Project
  • Conflicts around the construction of the Villa Carlos Paz Environmental Center
  • The problem of solid urban waste in Córdoba

Contact

Male Martinez, malemartinez@fundeps.org

María Victoria Gerbaldo, victoriagerbaldo@fundeps.org

2 de June de 2017
Tags: BID, Environment, Global Governance, Infrastructure Financing, Social and Environmental Standards, Solid Waste
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
https://fundeps.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/18740122_302056623550881_1873217855581788519_n_0-1.jpg 330 750 Fundeps.org https://fundeps.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/logo-2026-300x120.png Fundeps.org2017-06-02 00:06:182024-08-14 19:54:16Repeated figurine: garbage, conflicts and San Roque lake
You might also like
Gender and International Financial Institutions: the case of the Inter-American Development Bank
FUNDEPS co-organizes regional workshop on infrastructure finance trends in Latin America
The demands and challenges in accessing public environmental information
Drinking water in Alta Gracia: we present an injunction due to lack of public information
Accompaniment to indigenous communities in Rurrenabaque, Bolivia
Trunk gas pipelines: we make requests for information from agencies in the province of Córdoba
The UN urges banks to address attacks on human rights defenders
MapaInversiones Argentina Platform: Strengths and Aspects to Improve

Tags

Access to Information Access to Justice BID Chinese Investments Citizen Participation Democracy ENTs Environment Environmental Democracy Gender Global Governance Health Healthy nutrition IFIs Infrastructure Financing Legal Interruption of Pregnancy Sexual and Reproductive Rights Social and Environmental Standards Tobacco Control Transparency
See all tags

Acuerdo de Escazú

Emergencia Agroquímica

MOCI - monitoreo ciudadano en proyectos de infraestructura

{el entramado} Contamos historias. Acercamos Realidades.

Instagram

fundepsargentina

Trabajamos para que se garanticen los derechos humanos 🌱⚖️🗣️🌈💜🚭🍎
Promovemos la equidad de #genero, el derecho a la #salud y un #ambiente sano.

¡Es broma, pero no es mentira! La industria tabac ¡Es broma, pero no es mentira!

La industria tabacalera usa las redes sociales para captar a una nueva generación de consumidores, principalmente adolescentes y jóvenes.

Su principal estrategia es la promoción de bolsas de nicotina y vapers. 

🚫 Aunque hoy se permite vender estos productos, publicitarlos sigue siendo ilegal. Sin embargo, las propias marcas lo hacen de forma sistemática y a la vista de todo el mundo, porque nadie las controla ni las sanciona.

🕵🏻‍♀️Lo comprobamos en nuestra última investigación, en la que monitoreamos publicaciones de Instagram durante 2 meses. 

Exijamos que el Estado haga cumplir la ley para proteger la salud de adolescentes y jóvenes. ✊

📲 Compartí este posteo y leé el informe completo en el link de nuestra bio.

#ControlDeTabaco #BolsasDeNicotina #Vapers #Salud
¡Las Pérez Correa + conversatorio femi = planazo! ¡Las Pérez Correa + conversatorio femi = planazo!

¡TENEMOS NUEVA FECHA! El jueves 19 de noviembre nos encontramos para hablar de aborto, derechos y autonomías feministas, con una intervención artística de Las Pérez Correa para arrancar la tarde.

Después, panel con referentes para conversar sobre el acceso al aborto y los desafíos que tenemos por delante en Córdoba.

19/11 · 18 h · Auditorio del CePIA, Facultad de Artes UNC

Actividad libre y gratuita.

¡Ahora sí, agendalo! Nos vemos ahí.
Nos sorprende? No nos sorprende. 🕵🏻‍♀️Monitoream Nos sorprende? No nos sorprende. 

🕵🏻‍♀️Monitoreamos durante 2 meses publicidades de tabaco y nicotina en Instagram y comprobamos que son las propias marcas las que infringen la ley: desde sus cuentas oficiales y a la vista de todo el mundo.
3 de cada 4 publicaciones que relevamos son publicidad directa.

‼️En el caso de las bolsas de nicotina, 8 de cada 10 anuncios salen de las cuentas de las propias marcas, que pertenecen a dos de las tabacaleras más grandes del mundo.

Lo hacen sabiendo que en Argentina cualquier publicidad de tabaco y nicotina está prohibida, también en redes sociales. Y lo hacen porque nadie las controla ni las sanciona, mientras sus mensajes llegan todos los días a adolescentes y jóvenes. 😡

📢Exijamos que el Estado haga cumplir la ley para proteger su salud.

📲 Compartí este video y leé el informe completo en el link de nuestra bio.

#ControlDeTabaco #BolsasDeNicotina #Vapers #Salud
📱Cuando pensamos en los riesgos que enfrentan las 📱Cuando pensamos en los riesgos que enfrentan las y los adolescentes en redes sociales, solemos hablar de ciberacoso, apuestas o del tiempo frente a la pantalla.
 
💨Pero hay uno del que casi no se habla: la publicidad ilegal de vapers y bolsas de nicotina.

Instagram es la red más usada entre los 15 y los 17 años. Ahí, la industria tabacalera les llega con los mismos códigos que usan todos los días: influencers que admiran, deportistas, recitales, sabores y formatos de tendencia. A veces ni siquiera parece publicidad, pero lo es. Y está prohibida.

❗En nuestro último monitoreo comprobamos que no son casos aislados: es una estrategia para enganchar a una nueva generación. Y son las propias marcas las que infringen la ley: 8 de cada 10 anuncios de bolsas de nicotina se hacen desde sus cuentas oficiales. 

Cuidar a adolescentes en el entorno digital también es saber qué les venden, quién lo hace y con qué fin. 

Exijamos que el Estado haga cumplir la ley para proteger la salud de adolescentes y jóvenes.

📲 Compartí este posteo y leé el informe completo en el link de nuestra bio.
#ControlDeTabaco #BolsasDeNicotina #Vapeadores #Salud
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets por @fundeps

Newsletter Subscription

    Fundeps. Córdoba (CP X5000JZH), Argentina. info@fundeps.org
    • Link to X
    • Link to Facebook
    • Link to Instagram
    • Link to Mail
    • Link to Youtube
    • Link to LinkedIn
    • Link to TikTok
    Link to: Leyes de Acceso a la Información Pública en Argentina – June 2017 Link to: Leyes de Acceso a la Información Pública en Argentina – June 2017 Leyes de Acceso a la Información Pública en Argentina – June 2017 Link to: Organizations demand information from the government on the situation of ESCR Link to: Organizations demand information from the government on the situation of ESCR Organizations demand information from the government on the situation of ES...
    Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top