• ES
  • EN
Fundeps
  • About Fundeps
  • Team
  • Working areas
    • Environment
    • Democracy
    • Gender
    • Global Gorvernance
    • Health
  • News
  • Publications
  • DONATE
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Global Governance, News

Why does Argentina still not have a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights?

In the sixth session of the United Nations Intergovernmental Working Group on Business and Human Rights, negotiations were held on the second legally binding treaty to regulate the activity of transnational companies. There is still time for this instrument to come into force, so it is still important that Argentina finalize the review of its National Plan of Action on Business and Human Rights so that the State exercises its responsibility to disseminate and implement the Guiding Principles on the business and human rights.

The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights have emerged as a global standard for businesses and governments to prevent and address business-related human rights violations.

Next year, the Principles will be 10 years old, for this reason, the UN Intergovernmental Working Group, in charge of preparing a legally binding treaty on this matter, has launched in the middle of this year a new project ‘UNGPs10 + / NextdecadeBHR’ with the purpose of outlining the steps to follow for the next 10 years in the area of ​​business and human rights. In addition, it will take stock of the achievements obtained so far and analyze future challenges and existing gaps.

However, the Guiding Principles have worked and function as guides for States and businesses on how to protect and respect human rights and how to make reparation for victims. But, often, the distance between what the Principles have is usually far from the internal regulations of each State. For this reason, many countries have developed National Action Plans -PAN- so that the States are responsible for the dissemination and implementation of the Guiding Principles. Also, the NAPs serve as instruments of change capable of adapting to the local context but they do not hold transnational companies responsible for human rights violations, which is why it is relevant to have a legally binding treaty on this matter.

Thus, efforts to develop a legally binding treaty on business and human rights began in 2014. Since then, the Intergovernmental Working Group has worked to perfect this instrument by improving the content, scope, nature and form of the instrument. Last year, the Revised Draft of the binding treaty was published and discussed at the Annual Forum held in October 2019. In August this year, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Working Group published the Second Revised Draft of the legally binding instrument to regulate the activities of the companies and in October the sixth period of negotiations between the parties involved will be held.

However, until the approval and adoption of the Treaty by the States, the preparation and application of the NAPs continues to be necessary. So how is Argentina doing on this issue?

On the website of The Danish Institute for Human Rights, there is a map that details which countries already have a NAP, which are developing it, and which have other non-state initiatives. Argentina is in the group of countries that is still developing its National Action Plan. Consequently, and due to the importance of having a NAP, in September we made a request for information to the national government, consulting the status of the Argentine National Action Plan on companies and human rights. The response was provided in two parts, first in late September and then the information was completed in mid-October.

The Argentine PAN has already been prepared and for it to enter into force a decree from the President of the Nation is necessary. However, the Nation reported that the Draft Decree for the approval of the National Business and Human Rights Action Plan is under review by government authorities. Moreover, it has not yet been defined whether the participation of civil society through public consultations will be allowed, which is necessary to achieve a greater commitment to guarantee the respect and protection of human rights by the State and companies. transnational corporations and effective remedies for the victims.

When consulting on the position of the national government regarding the legally binding instrument, the Ministry of Foreign Relations replied that Argentina abstained from Resolution 26/9 of 2014, which approves the constitution of an Intergovernmental Working Group for the purpose to develop a legally binding international instrument to regulate the activities of transnational corporations and other commercial companies with respect to human rights. However, Argentina has participated in all the sessions held by the working group and was present at the last session in October this year.

So, it is not only necessary and urgent that the UN Working Group advance in the elaboration and conclusion of the Treaty, it is also urgent that Argentina do the same with its National Plan of Action on business and human rights. As the plans are oriented according to the Guiding Principles, elaborated according to the context of each State, they must be the product of transparent, participatory processes and open to dialogue. For this reason, it is essential that the National Government jointly review with civil society, academia, unions and other interested parties, the draft of the PAN so that it effectively serves as an instrument in the elimination of obstacles and in the promotion of good practices in the compliance with human rights related to business activities.

From Fundeps we will continue to monitor the process of elaboration of the Argentine PAN as well as the International Legally Binding Treaty on transnational companies and human rights.

More information

  • 9th Annual Forum on Business and Human Rights – Fundeps
  • The V Regional Forum on Business and Human Rights for Latin America and the Caribbean was held – Fundeps
  • When the discourse is diluted: human rights and transnational companies – Camila Bocco
  • National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights – The Danish Institute for Human Rights
  • Binding Treaty on Business and Human Rights: Comments from Fundeps and the new revised Draft – Fundeps
  • The second revised draft legally binding instrument on business activities and human rights – OHCHR
  • Argentine National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (draft) – Ministry of Justice and Human Rights of the Nation

Author

  • Sofia Brocanelli

Contact

  • Gonzalo Roza, gon.roza@fundeps.org
27 de November de 2020
Tags: Global Governance, Human Rights and Companies
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
0 0 Comunicaciones Fundeps https://fundeps.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/logo-2026-300x120.png Comunicaciones Fundeps2020-11-27 12:49:222024-11-14 13:27:50Why does Argentina still not have a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights?
You might also like
IDB: the president was dismissed and the possibility opens for a Latin American woman
IDB began public consultation for the new Access to Information Policy
We make comments and observations on the IDB’s Environmental and Social Policy Framework from a gender perspective
Civil Society Organizations’ critics to bank interpretations on human rights responsibilities
Observations on IDB Invest’s Environmental and Social Sustainability Policy draft from a gender-sensitive perspective
Is a new international financial architecture possible?
We present the report on gender and advertising in Rosario
Comments to strengthen the IDB’s Access to Information Policy

Tags

Access to Information Access to Justice BID Chinese Investments Citizen Participation Democracy ENTs Environment Environmental Democracy Gender Global Governance Health Healthy nutrition IFIs Infrastructure Financing Legal Interruption of Pregnancy Sexual and Reproductive Rights Social and Environmental Standards Tobacco Control Transparency
See all tags

Acuerdo de Escazú

Emergencia Agroquímica

MOCI - monitoreo ciudadano en proyectos de infraestructura

{el entramado} Contamos historias. Acercamos Realidades.

Instagram

fundepsargentina

Trabajamos para que se garanticen los derechos humanos 🌱⚖️🗣️🌈💜🚭🍎
Promovemos la equidad de #genero, el derecho a la #salud y un #ambiente sano.

Este viernes 31 de julio realizamos un nuevo encue Este viernes 31 de julio realizamos un nuevo encuentro de formación en derechos sexuales y (no) reproductivos. 

En articulación con el Consultorio de Salud Integral y con el aval de la DAJA, compartimos la jornada de capacitación con profesionales del Hospital Vicente Agüero de Jesús María.

Más de 15 profesionales de diversas disciplinas se dieron cita, para conocer diferentes aspectos de la práctica de AMEU y fortalecer su trabajo diario, en pos del acceso al aborto legal, seguro y gratuito.

Como en cada instancia, celebramos el compromiso de cada participante y agradecemos especialmente a la Dra. Kenia Torres y al Director del Hospital, Dr. Javier Díaz, por la predisposición para recibirnos.
La información como herramienta ya está disponible La información como herramienta ya está disponible en Aprender con Fundeps.

Aprendé a ejercer el derecho de acceso a la información pública y a usarlo para defender derechos, monitorear decisiones e impulsar procesos de incidencia.

En este curso vas a aprender:

📌 Cómo hacer solicitudes de acceso a la información pública.
📌 Qué hacer cuando un organismo no responde.
📌 Cómo acceder a información sobre proyectos financiados por organismos internacionales.

💻 Curso virtual, gratuito y autoadministrado.
🔗 Inscribite en aprender.fundeps.org
🌎 Hace un año, la @corteidhoficial emitió su histó 🌎 Hace un año, la @corteidhoficial emitió su histórica Opinión Consultiva sobre la emergencia climática.

✊ Una victoria para quienes defienden el ambiente en América Latina y el Caribe: la Corte confirmó que proteger a las personas defensoras del ambiente no es opcional. Es una obligación legal.

⚖️ Para explicar qué exige esa protección, la Corte se apoyó en el Acuerdo de Escazú. Resultado: la gran mayoría de Estados de América Latina y el Caribe no pueden ignorar los estándares de Escazú, incluso si aún no han ratificado el tratado.

🔎 La implicación es clara: los países de la región deben fortalecer el acceso a la información, la participación pública, la justicia ambiental y la protección de quienes defienden el ambiente. 

📝 La Opinión abre nuevas rutas para frenar la criminalización de personas defensoras, responder a las restricciones al espacio cívico y defender la participación pública en países como Costa Rica, Guatemala y Perú. Compartimos el análisis de  @manizalmigrante del @ciel_org

📣 La discusión ya no es si los países de América Latina y el Caribe deben proteger a quienes defienden el ambiente. Eso ya está claro. Ahora hay que usar la Opinión: en tribunales, reformas, debates públicos y procesos de movilización para exigir mejores garantías y mayor protección.

🔗 Lee el análisis completo en el link en www.ciel.org/corte-idh-escazu-personas-defensoras/
Seguimos compartiendo algunos momentos del 3° Encu Seguimos compartiendo algunos momentos del 3° Encuentro Provincial de Redes de Compromiso y Cuidados 🧡

Creemos que no hay mejor manera de cerrar una jornada de formación, intercambio y construcción colectiva que encontrándonos también desde el arte. Porque la música y la poesía también nos invitan a imaginar otros mundos posibles.

Así vivimos Revuelo Sur, Íntimas, el espectáculo de Susy Shock junto al Dúo Bazán-Bonillo, que acompañó el cierre de este encuentro.

Gracias a todas las personas que se acercaron y fueron parte de esta jornada.
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets por @fundeps

Newsletter Subscription

    Fundeps. Córdoba (CP X5000JZH), Argentina. info@fundeps.org
    • Link to X
    • Link to Facebook
    • Link to Instagram
    • Link to Mail
    • Link to Youtube
    • Link to LinkedIn
    • Link to TikTok
    Link to: We met with INADI for the complaints made against the Fasta school network Link to: We met with INADI for the complaints made against the Fasta school network We met with INADI for the complaints made against the Fasta school network Link to: Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy (IVE) bills: comparative analysis Link to: Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy (IVE) bills: comparative analysis Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy (IVE) bills: comparative analysis
    Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top