• ES
  • EN
Fundeps
  • About Fundeps
  • Team
  • Working areas
    • Environment
    • Democracy
    • Gender
    • Global Gorvernance
    • Health
  • News
  • Publications
  • DONATE
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Global Governance, News

Why does Argentina still not have a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights?

In the sixth session of the United Nations Intergovernmental Working Group on Business and Human Rights, negotiations were held on the second legally binding treaty to regulate the activity of transnational companies. There is still time for this instrument to come into force, so it is still important that Argentina finalize the review of its National Plan of Action on Business and Human Rights so that the State exercises its responsibility to disseminate and implement the Guiding Principles on the business and human rights.

The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights have emerged as a global standard for businesses and governments to prevent and address business-related human rights violations.

Next year, the Principles will be 10 years old, for this reason, the UN Intergovernmental Working Group, in charge of preparing a legally binding treaty on this matter, has launched in the middle of this year a new project ‘UNGPs10 + / NextdecadeBHR’ with the purpose of outlining the steps to follow for the next 10 years in the area of ​​business and human rights. In addition, it will take stock of the achievements obtained so far and analyze future challenges and existing gaps.

However, the Guiding Principles have worked and function as guides for States and businesses on how to protect and respect human rights and how to make reparation for victims. But, often, the distance between what the Principles have is usually far from the internal regulations of each State. For this reason, many countries have developed National Action Plans -PAN- so that the States are responsible for the dissemination and implementation of the Guiding Principles. Also, the NAPs serve as instruments of change capable of adapting to the local context but they do not hold transnational companies responsible for human rights violations, which is why it is relevant to have a legally binding treaty on this matter.

Thus, efforts to develop a legally binding treaty on business and human rights began in 2014. Since then, the Intergovernmental Working Group has worked to perfect this instrument by improving the content, scope, nature and form of the instrument. Last year, the Revised Draft of the binding treaty was published and discussed at the Annual Forum held in October 2019. In August this year, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Working Group published the Second Revised Draft of the legally binding instrument to regulate the activities of the companies and in October the sixth period of negotiations between the parties involved will be held.

However, until the approval and adoption of the Treaty by the States, the preparation and application of the NAPs continues to be necessary. So how is Argentina doing on this issue?

On the website of The Danish Institute for Human Rights, there is a map that details which countries already have a NAP, which are developing it, and which have other non-state initiatives. Argentina is in the group of countries that is still developing its National Action Plan. Consequently, and due to the importance of having a NAP, in September we made a request for information to the national government, consulting the status of the Argentine National Action Plan on companies and human rights. The response was provided in two parts, first in late September and then the information was completed in mid-October.

The Argentine PAN has already been prepared and for it to enter into force a decree from the President of the Nation is necessary. However, the Nation reported that the Draft Decree for the approval of the National Business and Human Rights Action Plan is under review by government authorities. Moreover, it has not yet been defined whether the participation of civil society through public consultations will be allowed, which is necessary to achieve a greater commitment to guarantee the respect and protection of human rights by the State and companies. transnational corporations and effective remedies for the victims.

When consulting on the position of the national government regarding the legally binding instrument, the Ministry of Foreign Relations replied that Argentina abstained from Resolution 26/9 of 2014, which approves the constitution of an Intergovernmental Working Group for the purpose to develop a legally binding international instrument to regulate the activities of transnational corporations and other commercial companies with respect to human rights. However, Argentina has participated in all the sessions held by the working group and was present at the last session in October this year.

So, it is not only necessary and urgent that the UN Working Group advance in the elaboration and conclusion of the Treaty, it is also urgent that Argentina do the same with its National Plan of Action on business and human rights. As the plans are oriented according to the Guiding Principles, elaborated according to the context of each State, they must be the product of transparent, participatory processes and open to dialogue. For this reason, it is essential that the National Government jointly review with civil society, academia, unions and other interested parties, the draft of the PAN so that it effectively serves as an instrument in the elimination of obstacles and in the promotion of good practices in the compliance with human rights related to business activities.

From Fundeps we will continue to monitor the process of elaboration of the Argentine PAN as well as the International Legally Binding Treaty on transnational companies and human rights.

More information

  • 9th Annual Forum on Business and Human Rights – Fundeps
  • The V Regional Forum on Business and Human Rights for Latin America and the Caribbean was held – Fundeps
  • When the discourse is diluted: human rights and transnational companies – Camila Bocco
  • National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights – The Danish Institute for Human Rights
  • Binding Treaty on Business and Human Rights: Comments from Fundeps and the new revised Draft – Fundeps
  • The second revised draft legally binding instrument on business activities and human rights – OHCHR
  • Argentine National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (draft) – Ministry of Justice and Human Rights of the Nation

Author

  • Sofia Brocanelli

Contact

  • Gonzalo Roza, gon.roza@fundeps.org
27 de November de 2020
Tags: Global Governance, Human Rights and Companies
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
0 0 Comunicaciones Fundeps https://fundeps.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/logo-2026-300x120.png Comunicaciones Fundeps2020-11-27 12:49:222024-11-14 13:27:50Why does Argentina still not have a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights?
You might also like
Repeated figurine: garbage, conflicts and San Roque lake
Follow-up of relations between China and Latin America: exchange of experiences
IDB: the president was dismissed and the possibility opens for a Latin American woman
Consult on Human Rights and International Financial Institutions.
Gender and International Financial Institutions: the case of the Inter-American Development Bank
We request the intervention as amicus curiae in the Porta Hnos case.
Representatives of civil society meet with president of the IDB
UN Rapporteurs Urge the World Bank to Recognize Human Rights in its Policies

Tags

Access to Information Access to Justice BID Chinese Investments Citizen Participation Democracy ENTs Environment Environmental Democracy Gender Global Governance Health Healthy nutrition IFIs Infrastructure Financing Legal Interruption of Pregnancy Sexual and Reproductive Rights Social and Environmental Standards Tobacco Control Transparency
See all tags

Acuerdo de Escazú

Emergencia Agroquímica

MOCI - monitoreo ciudadano en proyectos de infraestructura

{el entramado} Contamos historias. Acercamos Realidades.

Instagram

fundepsargentina

Trabajamos para que se garanticen los derechos humanos 🌱⚖️🗣️🌈💜🚭🍎
Promovemos la equidad de #genero, el derecho a la #salud y un #ambiente sano.

¡Es broma, pero no es mentira! La industria tabac ¡Es broma, pero no es mentira!

La industria tabacalera usa las redes sociales para captar a una nueva generación de consumidores, principalmente adolescentes y jóvenes.

Su principal estrategia es la promoción de bolsas de nicotina y vapers. 

🚫 Aunque hoy se permite vender estos productos, publicitarlos sigue siendo ilegal. Sin embargo, las propias marcas lo hacen de forma sistemática y a la vista de todo el mundo, porque nadie las controla ni las sanciona.

🕵🏻‍♀️Lo comprobamos en nuestra última investigación, en la que monitoreamos publicaciones de Instagram durante 2 meses. 

Exijamos que el Estado haga cumplir la ley para proteger la salud de adolescentes y jóvenes. ✊

📲 Compartí este posteo y leé el informe completo en el link de nuestra bio.

#ControlDeTabaco #BolsasDeNicotina #Vapers #Salud
¡Las Pérez Correa + conversatorio femi = planazo! ¡Las Pérez Correa + conversatorio femi = planazo!

¡TENEMOS NUEVA FECHA! El jueves 19 de noviembre nos encontramos para hablar de aborto, derechos y autonomías feministas, con una intervención artística de Las Pérez Correa para arrancar la tarde.

Después, panel con referentes para conversar sobre el acceso al aborto y los desafíos que tenemos por delante en Córdoba.

19/11 · 18 h · Auditorio del CePIA, Facultad de Artes UNC

Actividad libre y gratuita.

¡Ahora sí, agendalo! Nos vemos ahí.
Nos sorprende? No nos sorprende. 🕵🏻‍♀️Monitoream Nos sorprende? No nos sorprende. 

🕵🏻‍♀️Monitoreamos durante 2 meses publicidades de tabaco y nicotina en Instagram y comprobamos que son las propias marcas las que infringen la ley: desde sus cuentas oficiales y a la vista de todo el mundo.
3 de cada 4 publicaciones que relevamos son publicidad directa.

‼️En el caso de las bolsas de nicotina, 8 de cada 10 anuncios salen de las cuentas de las propias marcas, que pertenecen a dos de las tabacaleras más grandes del mundo.

Lo hacen sabiendo que en Argentina cualquier publicidad de tabaco y nicotina está prohibida, también en redes sociales. Y lo hacen porque nadie las controla ni las sanciona, mientras sus mensajes llegan todos los días a adolescentes y jóvenes. 😡

📢Exijamos que el Estado haga cumplir la ley para proteger su salud.

📲 Compartí este video y leé el informe completo en el link de nuestra bio.

#ControlDeTabaco #BolsasDeNicotina #Vapers #Salud
📱Cuando pensamos en los riesgos que enfrentan las 📱Cuando pensamos en los riesgos que enfrentan las y los adolescentes en redes sociales, solemos hablar de ciberacoso, apuestas o del tiempo frente a la pantalla.
 
💨Pero hay uno del que casi no se habla: la publicidad ilegal de vapers y bolsas de nicotina.

Instagram es la red más usada entre los 15 y los 17 años. Ahí, la industria tabacalera les llega con los mismos códigos que usan todos los días: influencers que admiran, deportistas, recitales, sabores y formatos de tendencia. A veces ni siquiera parece publicidad, pero lo es. Y está prohibida.

❗En nuestro último monitoreo comprobamos que no son casos aislados: es una estrategia para enganchar a una nueva generación. Y son las propias marcas las que infringen la ley: 8 de cada 10 anuncios de bolsas de nicotina se hacen desde sus cuentas oficiales. 

Cuidar a adolescentes en el entorno digital también es saber qué les venden, quién lo hace y con qué fin. 

Exijamos que el Estado haga cumplir la ley para proteger la salud de adolescentes y jóvenes.

📲 Compartí este posteo y leé el informe completo en el link de nuestra bio.
#ControlDeTabaco #BolsasDeNicotina #Vapeadores #Salud
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets por @fundeps

Newsletter Subscription

    Fundeps. Córdoba (CP X5000JZH), Argentina. info@fundeps.org
    • Link to X
    • Link to Facebook
    • Link to Instagram
    • Link to Mail
    • Link to Youtube
    • Link to LinkedIn
    • Link to TikTok
    Link to: We met with INADI for the complaints made against the Fasta school network Link to: We met with INADI for the complaints made against the Fasta school network We met with INADI for the complaints made against the Fasta school network Link to: Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy (IVE) bills: comparative analysis Link to: Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy (IVE) bills: comparative analysis Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy (IVE) bills: comparative analysis
    Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top