• ES
  • EN
Fundeps
  • About Fundeps
  • Team
  • Working areas
    • Environment
    • Democracy
    • Gender
    • Global Gorvernance
    • Health
  • News
  • Publications
  • DONATE
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Environment, News

Regression in the field of agrochemicals in Entre Ríos

On October 28, the Supreme Court of Justice of Entre Ríos, in the framework of an endless dispute between environmental groups, rural teachers and the Entre Rican government, issued a ruling validating provincial decree 2239/19, which establishes infamous distances of fumigation of the rural schools of said province.

“Below, we offer a google translate version of the original article in Spanish. This translation may not be accurate but serves as a general presentation of the article. For more accurate information, please switch to the Spanish version of the website. In addition, feel free to directly contact in English the person mentioned at the bottom of this article with regards to this topic”.

The judicial dispute began when the Ecological Forum of Paraná (FEP) and the Entrepreneurship Association of Entre Ríos (AGMER) promoted an environmental protection action against the Superior Government of the Province of Entre Ríos and the General Council of Education ( in the cause called the Ecologist Forum “1”). Faced with this action, Chamber II, room II of Paraná, issued a ruling admitting amparo and forbidding ground spraying with pesticides within a radius of one thousand meters (1,000 meters) around all rural schools in the Province of Entre Ríos, and the aerial spraying with the same pesticides within a radius of three thousand meters (3,000 meters) around these educational establishments; all this, until it is determined by the specific state areas that identical preventive effects will be obtained for the health of students and staff who attend them with different distances ”. That ruling was then confirmed by the Superior Court of Justice.

Following this judicial record in the month of January of this year, the Entre Rican governor through a decree (No. 4407/2018), established an “exclusion zone” of pesticide application of one hundred (100) meters radius for the case of land applications and five hundred (500) meters for aerial applications, measured from the center of the hull of the rural school. This new decree, which markedly diminished the protective distances around rural schools, was again challenged by the Ecological Forum of Paraná and Agmer through judicial proceedings, requesting the annulment of the decree.

Such request is based on the fact that the State of Entre Ríos was obliged (by the previous sentence) to carry out necessary studies prior to establishing smaller distances, to guarantee the health of the students and the staff of the rural schools. From this action, the Third Chamber of the Second Chamber in Civil and Commercial, on March 28, 2019, resolved to annul the aforementioned decree, because the Province had not carried out the necessary studies, a resolution that it adopted in a similar sense the Superior Court of Justice of Entre Ríos on May 14 of this year.

Even with all these pronouncements against it, the Government of Entre Ríos, by decree No. 2239/19 (dated 08/01/2019), insisted on reducing the distances of application of agrochemicals around rural schools. On this occasion, it established exclusion distances in relation to the hulls of rural schools, 100 meters for land spraying and 500 meters for aerial spraying. Before this new decree, the NGOs Forum Ecologista de Paraná and Agmer again resorted to justice by filing a new environmental protection, but this time against this new decree, arguing that the first of the sentences already analyzed was affected again. Such action obtained a positive pronouncement from the Third Chamber of the Second Chamber of Civil and Commercial Appeals, which ruled in favor of the amparistas, which decided to dictate the decree in question, under similar arguments as those that were held before the first attempt of the entrerriano Government to limit the distances of protection.

Before this last resolution, again contrary to the interests of the Government of Entre Ríos, and of its intention to reduce the distances of application, he appealed the sentence, finally obtaining a sentence favorable to his interests, at the expense of the protection of the health of students, teachers and staff of rural schools. Thus, the Superior Court of Justice of Entre Ríos, on October 28, ended the judicial course, ruling the validity of the last of the decrees (No. 2239/19).

Its main rationale was that the provisions resolved in the first ruling were transitory and therefore did not have the effect of “res judicata” and that said transience ended with the issuance of this decree. However, and almost absurdly, it raises a ridiculous modification: the 100 meters of shelter for ground spraying and the 500 meters for aerial spraying should be measured, not from the center of the school helmet, but from a plant barrier to be implanted. 150 meters away.

This questionable pronouncement, put an end to the judicial question in the Entre Rican justice. The organizations that were part of the fight for health and environmental rights, chose to continue their way before the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation. Thus, it will be up to the highest judicial body in Argentina to resolve the conflict in rural Entrerrian schools, ending an issue that will undoubtedly affect all rural classrooms in the country.

Links to each judicial pronouncement:

  • «Ecological Forum of Paraná and other c / superior government of the province of Entre Ríos and other s / action of amparo» (Nº 10711).
  • «Ecological Forum of Paraná and another c / superior government of the province of Entre Ríos s / Amparo Action» (cars No. 9624).
  • «Ecological Forum of Paraná (2), and another c / superior government of the province of Between rivers s / action of amparo» (cause N ° 24024).
  • «Ecological Forum of Paraná and other c / superior government of the province of Entre Ríos s / Amparo Action» (Nº 9850).
  • «Ecological Forum of Paraná (3) and another c / superior government of the province of Entre Ríos s / Amparo Action» (Nº 24321).

Author

María Laura Carrizo

Contact

Juan Bautista López, juanbautistalopez@fundeps.org
16 de December de 2019
Tags: Agrochemicals, Environment
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
0 0 Admi2024FunDEPS https://fundeps.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/logo-2026-300x120.png Admi2024FunDEPS2019-12-16 13:34:042024-06-30 16:02:59Regression in the field of agrochemicals in Entre Ríos
You might also like
The eviction in Molinari and the guarantees of the Escazú Agreement
New 2015 Annual Report
We present an Environmental Amparo for the contamination with pesticides in Colonia Tirolesa
One of lime and one of sand in the case against Porta Hnos.
The day of the animal in Argentina
We present a statement at the 16th Youth Conference on Climate Change.
Lithium and Energy Transition: 10 Key Questions
#WeWantToBreathe: A campaign against pollution in the Suquía River

Tags

Access to Information Access to Justice BID Chinese Investments Citizen Participation Democracy ENTs Environment Environmental Democracy Gender Global Governance Health Healthy nutrition IFIs Infrastructure Financing Legal Interruption of Pregnancy Sexual and Reproductive Rights Social and Environmental Standards Tobacco Control Transparency
See all tags

Acuerdo de Escazú

Emergencia Agroquímica

MOCI - monitoreo ciudadano en proyectos de infraestructura

{el entramado} Contamos historias. Acercamos Realidades.

Instagram

fundepsargentina

Trabajamos para que se garanticen los derechos humanos 🌱⚖️🗣️🌈💜🚭🍎
Promovemos la equidad de #genero, el derecho a la #salud y un #ambiente sano.

La Legislatura de Córdoba otorgó a Fundeps un bene La Legislatura de Córdoba otorgó a Fundeps un beneplácito por el Tercer encuentro Redes de compromiso y cuidados: “Acceso a la salud sexual integral. Debates urgentes”. El encuentro se realizó el pasado 20 de junio y reunió a más de cien profesionales de toda la provincia.

La mención (aprobada por unanimidad) fue iniciativa de la Legisladora Karen Acuña, en coautoría con las legisladoras Silvina Jurich, Ariela Szpanin, Doris Mansilla y Julieta Rinaldi. La misma expresa: “iniciativas con estas características, impulsadas por organizaciones de la sociedad civil, resultan fundamentales para fortalecer la protección y el ejercicio efectivo de los derechos ciudadanos, al tiempo que contribuyen a la construcción de una sociedad más justa, inclusiva e igualitaria".

Recibir este reconocimiento nos llena de orgullo y fortalece sin dudas los vínculos y el camino conjunto en pos del acceso a derechos en nuestra provincia.
Este viernes 31 de julio realizamos un nuevo encue Este viernes 31 de julio realizamos un nuevo encuentro de formación en derechos sexuales y (no) reproductivos. 

En articulación con el Consultorio de Salud Integral y con el aval de la DAJA, compartimos la jornada de capacitación con profesionales del Hospital Vicente Agüero de Jesús María.

Más de 15 profesionales de diversas disciplinas se dieron cita, para conocer diferentes aspectos de la práctica de AMEU y fortalecer su trabajo diario, en pos del acceso al aborto legal, seguro y gratuito.

Como en cada instancia, celebramos el compromiso de cada participante y agradecemos especialmente a la Dra. Kenia Torres y al Director del Hospital, Dr. Javier Díaz, por la predisposición para recibirnos.
La información como herramienta ya está disponible La información como herramienta ya está disponible en Aprender con Fundeps.

Aprendé a ejercer el derecho de acceso a la información pública y a usarlo para defender derechos, monitorear decisiones e impulsar procesos de incidencia.

En este curso vas a aprender:

📌 Cómo hacer solicitudes de acceso a la información pública.
📌 Qué hacer cuando un organismo no responde.
📌 Cómo acceder a información sobre proyectos financiados por organismos internacionales.

💻 Curso virtual, gratuito y autoadministrado.
🔗 Inscribite en aprender.fundeps.org
🌎 Hace un año, la @corteidhoficial emitió su histó 🌎 Hace un año, la @corteidhoficial emitió su histórica Opinión Consultiva sobre la emergencia climática.

✊ Una victoria para quienes defienden el ambiente en América Latina y el Caribe: la Corte confirmó que proteger a las personas defensoras del ambiente no es opcional. Es una obligación legal.

⚖️ Para explicar qué exige esa protección, la Corte se apoyó en el Acuerdo de Escazú. Resultado: la gran mayoría de Estados de América Latina y el Caribe no pueden ignorar los estándares de Escazú, incluso si aún no han ratificado el tratado.

🔎 La implicación es clara: los países de la región deben fortalecer el acceso a la información, la participación pública, la justicia ambiental y la protección de quienes defienden el ambiente. 

📝 La Opinión abre nuevas rutas para frenar la criminalización de personas defensoras, responder a las restricciones al espacio cívico y defender la participación pública en países como Costa Rica, Guatemala y Perú. Compartimos el análisis de  @manizalmigrante del @ciel_org

📣 La discusión ya no es si los países de América Latina y el Caribe deben proteger a quienes defienden el ambiente. Eso ya está claro. Ahora hay que usar la Opinión: en tribunales, reformas, debates públicos y procesos de movilización para exigir mejores garantías y mayor protección.

🔗 Lee el análisis completo en el link en www.ciel.org/corte-idh-escazu-personas-defensoras/
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets por @fundeps

Newsletter Subscription

    Fundeps. Córdoba (CP X5000JZH), Argentina. info@fundeps.org
    • Link to X
    • Link to Facebook
    • Link to Instagram
    • Link to Mail
    • Link to Youtube
    • Link to LinkedIn
    • Link to TikTok
    Link to: The IDB updates its access to information policy in 2020 Link to: The IDB updates its access to information policy in 2020 The IDB updates its access to information policy in 2020 Link to: Request an ANMAT to update your National Drug Vademecum Link to: Request an ANMAT to update your National Drug Vademecum Request an ANMAT to update your National Drug Vademecum
    Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top