• ES
  • EN
Fundeps
  • About Fundeps
  • Team
  • Working areas
    • Environment
    • Democracy
    • Gender
    • Global Gorvernance
    • Health
  • News
  • Publications
  • DONATE
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Environment, News

We present observations to the “good practices” of agrochemical application

The Final Report of the Interministerial Working Group on Good Practices in the Field of Phytosanitary Applications was submitted to public consultation from July 20 to August 20. From FUNDEPS we present our observations and objections to it.

“Below, we offer a google translate version of the original article in Spanish. This translation may not be accurate but serves as a general presentation of the article. For more accurate information, please switch to the Spanish version of the website. In addition, feel free to directly contact in English the person mentioned at the bottom of this article with regards to this topic”.

Through Joint Resolution No. 1/2018, the Ministries of Agribusiness and Environment and Sustainable Development of the Nation created an Interministerial Working Group on Good Practices in the Field of Phytosanitary Applications.
The objectives of the working group were:
• Elaborate the principles for ordering national public policies on phytosanitary applications, especially in buffer zones, and
• Make recommendations regarding how to improve the adoption, control and monitoring of good practices in the application of phytosanitary products.

The Working Group is made up of representatives of both ministries, the National Service of Agrifood Health and Quality (SENASA) and the National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), who had two representatives each. In addition, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation, the Federal Council of the Environment (COFEMA) and the Federal Agricultural Council (CFA), who participated with only one representative, formed a part. He met six times between April 5 and July 5, 2018.

The final result was a document that proposes 12 principles and 23 recommendations, which was open to public consultation for a month through a web platform with consultative status. The participation of the society was very low, only 180 people left settled their contributions, which accounts for the little publicity that was given to the report and the public consultation carried out by both ministries.

From FUNDEPS we make some considerations and objections to the document, including:
– The Interministerial Working Group is composed mostly of representatives of agriculture;
– Absence of participation in the work process of qualified technical professionals, universities, NGOs and civil society in general.
– The need for a law as a public health issue is not analyzed;

– It is not taken into account that sprays can not be controlled. No matter how much “good agricultural practices” are adopted and climatic conditions are taken into account, the chemical products that are used have persistence in the environment and are mobilized through water and air even after the application is made;
– There is no clarity regarding the technical criteria that would be used to delimit the “buffer zones”, nor how they would be respected;
– The carrying out of epidemiological surveys from the Ministry of Health is not effectively ensured in order to know the situation of the populations near cultivation areas;
– It does not consider the principles of the General Environmental Law No. 25,675 that governs any national environmental policy, in particular the principles of prevention and precaution;
– It does not contemplate an inescindible sanctioning regime to the control and monitoring of “good agricultural practices”, among others.
One of the proposals presented in the report is to promote a national law on the application of phytosanitary products, complementary to the regulation on product registration and the law on empty pesticide containers. From FUNDEPS we support the enactment of a national law of minimum budgets referred to the application of agrochemicals guided by the precautionary principle and to establish a reference framework that protects the fundamental rights to the environment, health and quality of life of people .

More information:

Observaciones al informe sobre buenas prácticas en aplicaciones de Fitosanitarios

Grupo_Interministerial_Fitosanitarios

Authors:

Lourdes Aparicio, Juan Bautista López y María Pérez Alsina

Contact:

María Pérez Alsina – mariaperezalsina@fundeps.org

3 de September de 2018
Tags: Health
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
0 0 Comunicaciones Fundeps https://fundeps.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/logo-2026-300x120.png Comunicaciones Fundeps2018-09-03 02:50:482024-06-30 16:03:08We present observations to the “good practices” of agrochemical application
You might also like
Mapping and analysis of food industry arguments against labeling laws in Latin America
The basic food basket, a policy that undermines the right to adequate nourishment
Health at risk: government decisions that affect us
Complaint against the Arcor campaign “Your fair share” before the Ombudsman for Children and Adolescents
Kit of materials: Let’s build a healthier school
The basic argentine food basket from the perspective of human rights
Fundeps at Global Conference EITI 2016
Recommendations for the promotion of healthy school environments

Tags

Access to Information Access to Justice BID Chinese Investments Citizen Participation Democracy ENTs Environment Environmental Democracy Gender Global Governance Health Healthy nutrition IFIs Infrastructure Financing Legal Interruption of Pregnancy Sexual and Reproductive Rights Social and Environmental Standards Tobacco Control Transparency
See all tags

Acuerdo de Escazú

Emergencia Agroquímica

MOCI - monitoreo ciudadano en proyectos de infraestructura

{el entramado} Contamos historias. Acercamos Realidades.

Instagram

fundepsargentina

Trabajamos para que se garanticen los derechos humanos 🌱⚖️🗣️🌈💜🚭🍎
Promovemos la equidad de #genero, el derecho a la #salud y un #ambiente sano.

Y todo esto quedó en un papel? No. Ya hay avances. Y todo esto quedó en un papel? No. Ya hay avances. Pero tampoco está resuelto.

Hay plantas de tratamiento que comenzaron a funcionar, obras de cloacas terminadas y establecimientos que fueron auditados por posible contaminación.

➡️ También quedan medidas por cumplir y avances que necesitan seguimiento. Porque mostrar lo que se hizo también sirve para saber qué falta.

Para seguir acompañando este proceso y sosteniendo el trabajo que todavía queda, necesitamos tu apoyo.

Doná hoy.
La Justicia no solo dijo que el lago está contamin La Justicia no solo dijo que el lago está contaminado. También ordenó qué tiene que hacer el Estado para empezar a sanearlo.

La sentencia establece medidas concretas, con plazos y obligaciones que involucran a la Provincia y a los municipios de la cuenca.

Entre ellas: avanzar con las obras cloacales, controlar los vertidos contaminantes, fortalecer la fiscalización y garantizar espacios de participación y transparencia.

Deslizá para conocer qué tiene que pasar para que el saneamiento avance.

Ayudanos a seguir trabajando para que estas medidas se cumplan. Doná hoy.
Hoy, 4 de septiembre, es el Día Mundial de la Salu Hoy, 4 de septiembre, es el Día Mundial de la Salud Sexual. Una fecha que nos invita a volver sobre las discusiones que atraviesan el acceso a la salud sexual y (no) reproductiva: condiciones de acceso para que sea integral y de calidad, desde un enfoque de derechos y con perspectiva de diversidad.

En el mes de junio nos encontramos en el 3° Encuentro Provincial de Redes de Compromiso y Cuidados: Salud sexual Integral con Perspectiva de Diversidad para poner en común experiencias y preguntas sobre estos desafíos.

Hoy recuperamos algunas de las voces que fueron parte de las exposiciones de ese encuentro para volver sobre dos preguntas que siguen abiertas:
¿Cuál es hoy el debate más urgente cuando hablamos de salud integral y diversidad?
¿Por qué es importante encontrarnos en este contexto?

Porque garantizar el derecho a la salud también implica seguir encontrándonos para pensar, discutir y construir respuestas colectivas.
🕰Han pasado 84 años… y seguimos hablando del Lago 🕰Han pasado 84 años… y seguimos hablando del Lago San Roque.
Bueno, no tanto. Pero sí llevamos más de cuatro años trabajando para que el saneamiento de la cuenca deje de ser una promesa y se convierta en una realidad.

En 2022 presentamos un amparo colectivo junto a la comunidad de la cuenca. En abril de 2025, la Justicia reconoció el daño ambiental y ordenó sanear el lago.

❗¿El problema? Un fallo no alcanza por sí solo. El Plan de Saneamiento ya está en marcha y todavía queda mucho por hacer.

En este carrusel te contamos qué pasó y por qué seguimos hablando del Lago San Roque.

Si querés que este trabajo continúe, podés sumarte con una donación. [link en bio]
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets por @fundeps

Newsletter Subscription

    Fundeps. Córdoba (CP X5000JZH), Argentina. info@fundeps.org
    • Link to X
    • Link to Facebook
    • Link to Instagram
    • Link to Mail
    • Link to Youtube
    • Link to LinkedIn
    • Link to TikTok
    Link to: New analysis on regulations in development institutions present in Latin America Link to: New analysis on regulations in development institutions present in Latin America New analysis on regulations in development institutions present in Latin Am... Link to: The right to Public Education in the crosshairs Link to: The right to Public Education in the crosshairs The right to Public Education in the crosshairs
    Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top