• ES
  • EN
Fundeps
  • About Fundeps
  • Team
  • Working areas
    • Environment
    • Democracy
    • Gender
    • Global Gorvernance
    • Health
  • News
  • Publications
  • DONATE
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Environment, News

We present observations to the “good practices” of agrochemical application

The Final Report of the Interministerial Working Group on Good Practices in the Field of Phytosanitary Applications was submitted to public consultation from July 20 to August 20. From FUNDEPS we present our observations and objections to it.

“Below, we offer a google translate version of the original article in Spanish. This translation may not be accurate but serves as a general presentation of the article. For more accurate information, please switch to the Spanish version of the website. In addition, feel free to directly contact in English the person mentioned at the bottom of this article with regards to this topic”.

Through Joint Resolution No. 1/2018, the Ministries of Agribusiness and Environment and Sustainable Development of the Nation created an Interministerial Working Group on Good Practices in the Field of Phytosanitary Applications.
The objectives of the working group were:
• Elaborate the principles for ordering national public policies on phytosanitary applications, especially in buffer zones, and
• Make recommendations regarding how to improve the adoption, control and monitoring of good practices in the application of phytosanitary products.

The Working Group is made up of representatives of both ministries, the National Service of Agrifood Health and Quality (SENASA) and the National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), who had two representatives each. In addition, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation, the Federal Council of the Environment (COFEMA) and the Federal Agricultural Council (CFA), who participated with only one representative, formed a part. He met six times between April 5 and July 5, 2018.

The final result was a document that proposes 12 principles and 23 recommendations, which was open to public consultation for a month through a web platform with consultative status. The participation of the society was very low, only 180 people left settled their contributions, which accounts for the little publicity that was given to the report and the public consultation carried out by both ministries.

From FUNDEPS we make some considerations and objections to the document, including:
– The Interministerial Working Group is composed mostly of representatives of agriculture;
– Absence of participation in the work process of qualified technical professionals, universities, NGOs and civil society in general.
– The need for a law as a public health issue is not analyzed;

– It is not taken into account that sprays can not be controlled. No matter how much “good agricultural practices” are adopted and climatic conditions are taken into account, the chemical products that are used have persistence in the environment and are mobilized through water and air even after the application is made;
– There is no clarity regarding the technical criteria that would be used to delimit the “buffer zones”, nor how they would be respected;
– The carrying out of epidemiological surveys from the Ministry of Health is not effectively ensured in order to know the situation of the populations near cultivation areas;
– It does not consider the principles of the General Environmental Law No. 25,675 that governs any national environmental policy, in particular the principles of prevention and precaution;
– It does not contemplate an inescindible sanctioning regime to the control and monitoring of “good agricultural practices”, among others.
One of the proposals presented in the report is to promote a national law on the application of phytosanitary products, complementary to the regulation on product registration and the law on empty pesticide containers. From FUNDEPS we support the enactment of a national law of minimum budgets referred to the application of agrochemicals guided by the precautionary principle and to establish a reference framework that protects the fundamental rights to the environment, health and quality of life of people .

More information:

Observaciones al informe sobre buenas prácticas en aplicaciones de Fitosanitarios

Grupo_Interministerial_Fitosanitarios

Authors:

Lourdes Aparicio, Juan Bautista López y María Pérez Alsina

Contact:

María Pérez Alsina – mariaperezalsina@fundeps.org

3 de September de 2018
Tags: Health
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
0 0 Comunicaciones Fundeps https://fundeps.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/logo-2026-300x120.png Comunicaciones Fundeps2018-09-03 02:50:482024-06-30 16:03:08We present observations to the “good practices” of agrochemical application
You might also like
National government seek to agree a new model of food labeling
Actions that transform: see our Annuary 2023
Fundeps at Global Conference EITI 2016
Regulatory mapping – Front-end warning labeling of food octagons in the Americas
Is Argentina closer to saying #ByeTransFats?
A dialogue on food programs, public purchases and the Law for the Promotion of Healthy Eating
There are no more excuses to comply with the front labeling law
Introducing amicus curiae to defend the right to information and health

Tags

Access to Information Access to Justice BID Chinese Investments Citizen Participation Democracy ENTs Environment Environmental Democracy Gender Global Governance Health Healthy nutrition IFIs Infrastructure Financing Legal Interruption of Pregnancy Sexual and Reproductive Rights Social and Environmental Standards Tobacco Control Transparency
See all tags

Acuerdo de Escazú

Emergencia Agroquímica

MOCI - monitoreo ciudadano en proyectos de infraestructura

{el entramado} Contamos historias. Acercamos Realidades.

Instagram

fundepsargentina

Trabajamos para que se garanticen los derechos humanos 🌱⚖️🗣️🌈💜🚭🍎
Promovemos la equidad de #genero, el derecho a la #salud y un #ambiente sano.

¡Es broma, pero no es mentira! La industria tabac ¡Es broma, pero no es mentira!

La industria tabacalera usa las redes sociales para captar a una nueva generación de consumidores, principalmente adolescentes y jóvenes.

Su principal estrategia es la promoción de bolsas de nicotina y vapers. 

🚫 Aunque hoy se permite vender estos productos, publicitarlos sigue siendo ilegal. Sin embargo, las propias marcas lo hacen de forma sistemática y a la vista de todo el mundo, porque nadie las controla ni las sanciona.

🕵🏻‍♀️Lo comprobamos en nuestra última investigación, en la que monitoreamos publicaciones de Instagram durante 2 meses. 

Exijamos que el Estado haga cumplir la ley para proteger la salud de adolescentes y jóvenes. ✊

📲 Compartí este posteo y leé el informe completo en el link de nuestra bio.

#ControlDeTabaco #BolsasDeNicotina #Vapers #Salud
¡Las Pérez Correa + conversatorio femi = planazo! ¡Las Pérez Correa + conversatorio femi = planazo!

¡TENEMOS NUEVA FECHA! El jueves 19 de noviembre nos encontramos para hablar de aborto, derechos y autonomías feministas, con una intervención artística de Las Pérez Correa para arrancar la tarde.

Después, panel con referentes para conversar sobre el acceso al aborto y los desafíos que tenemos por delante en Córdoba.

19/11 · 18 h · Auditorio del CePIA, Facultad de Artes UNC

Actividad libre y gratuita.

¡Ahora sí, agendalo! Nos vemos ahí.
Nos sorprende? No nos sorprende. 🕵🏻‍♀️Monitoream Nos sorprende? No nos sorprende. 

🕵🏻‍♀️Monitoreamos durante 2 meses publicidades de tabaco y nicotina en Instagram y comprobamos que son las propias marcas las que infringen la ley: desde sus cuentas oficiales y a la vista de todo el mundo.
3 de cada 4 publicaciones que relevamos son publicidad directa.

‼️En el caso de las bolsas de nicotina, 8 de cada 10 anuncios salen de las cuentas de las propias marcas, que pertenecen a dos de las tabacaleras más grandes del mundo.

Lo hacen sabiendo que en Argentina cualquier publicidad de tabaco y nicotina está prohibida, también en redes sociales. Y lo hacen porque nadie las controla ni las sanciona, mientras sus mensajes llegan todos los días a adolescentes y jóvenes. 😡

📢Exijamos que el Estado haga cumplir la ley para proteger su salud.

📲 Compartí este video y leé el informe completo en el link de nuestra bio.

#ControlDeTabaco #BolsasDeNicotina #Vapers #Salud
📱Cuando pensamos en los riesgos que enfrentan las 📱Cuando pensamos en los riesgos que enfrentan las y los adolescentes en redes sociales, solemos hablar de ciberacoso, apuestas o del tiempo frente a la pantalla.
 
💨Pero hay uno del que casi no se habla: la publicidad ilegal de vapers y bolsas de nicotina.

Instagram es la red más usada entre los 15 y los 17 años. Ahí, la industria tabacalera les llega con los mismos códigos que usan todos los días: influencers que admiran, deportistas, recitales, sabores y formatos de tendencia. A veces ni siquiera parece publicidad, pero lo es. Y está prohibida.

❗En nuestro último monitoreo comprobamos que no son casos aislados: es una estrategia para enganchar a una nueva generación. Y son las propias marcas las que infringen la ley: 8 de cada 10 anuncios de bolsas de nicotina se hacen desde sus cuentas oficiales. 

Cuidar a adolescentes en el entorno digital también es saber qué les venden, quién lo hace y con qué fin. 

Exijamos que el Estado haga cumplir la ley para proteger la salud de adolescentes y jóvenes.

📲 Compartí este posteo y leé el informe completo en el link de nuestra bio.
#ControlDeTabaco #BolsasDeNicotina #Vapeadores #Salud
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets por @fundeps

Newsletter Subscription

    Fundeps. Córdoba (CP X5000JZH), Argentina. info@fundeps.org
    • Link to X
    • Link to Facebook
    • Link to Instagram
    • Link to Mail
    • Link to Youtube
    • Link to LinkedIn
    • Link to TikTok
    Link to: New analysis on regulations in development institutions present in Latin America Link to: New analysis on regulations in development institutions present in Latin America New analysis on regulations in development institutions present in Latin Am... Link to: The right to Public Education in the crosshairs Link to: The right to Public Education in the crosshairs The right to Public Education in the crosshairs
    Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top